Friday, December 25, 2015

“December’s memories”

In honor of the Birth of the One we commemorate on this day, I share the following:

I recall the first time I heard the song, "Mary Did you Know?” (link provided below), it was a heart-heavy night in 1997. A Saturday December night, and I arrived home from doing weekly grocery shopping; and my husband, John, was watching a Christmas Concert.

Just as I walked in, Kathy Mattea had taken to center stage. For a moment after applause, silence, then, the first cords, words, stanza of the song: “Mary did you know.”

Since the first December in which I shared my life with my son, heavy-with-child I was then, him in my womb; followed by Decembers multiplied, that led to years in which miles separated us Christmas season, sometimes  Christmas day; thus, like my womb that first enwrapped my son; December seemed naturally-designated for wrapping-up, safe-guarding, and when possible making, memories.

Thus, “December’s memories” were always keen, replete with vivid details, poignant.

Thus, that December night, as I first heard the song, “Mary did you know?” the flood flowed free from my dam of memories. 

How could it not?

The song speaks of a momma, a momma heavy-with-child. Any woman who has ever known the honor of the Creator of all things, entrusting you with a helpless-at-first, fragile, precious tender life knows, the heart of a momma, during pregnancy, is a heart under cultivation. It’s tender. At least such was so in my heart.

It was a heart, one surrendered to the plows, the rakes, then the spikes passing through it; it was a heart you prayed, that, like the pre-winter fields plowed, raked, furrowed, and seeded, your heart would likewise be ridded of the rocks, the hardness, the boulders that would harm full growth of the seeds the Sower sowed.

Any man who has ever loved a woman with child, he also knows, not only is a child in the making in the womb of that woman, but the vessel housing that child is likewise a woman under construction. Thus, day by day, on the two lives (minimally two lives…), the hand of the Potter works.

What’s more, if the natural process of such a miraculous concept—the concept, in short, of how fearfully and wonderfully we are made—functions normally, one soon learns, as the embryo gradually becomes a fetus; with sprouting limbs, to those added, feet, toes, hands and fingers; those hands, become the Hands of God.

Thus, the hand, which, directed by his sight which zeros in on your hand, your fingers; shakenly reaches for them, then with his tiny fingers firmly grips one of your fingers; that little hand that does likewise to the painted wooden camel, pig, dog, and kitten in the mobile that hangs above his bassinet; becomes, unquestionably,  the Hand of God.

And with the same firmness that little hand grips the finger it reached for, or the wooden animal it reached for, so too becomes the grip of the Hand of God on your life, via the hand—the life—of your child.

It’s a hand that forever forms you. Sculptors your days. 

Unique, paramount, to say the least, was the above miracle of life experienced by Mary the Mother of Jesus. In line with the above delineated miracle,  the song, “Mary did you know,” speaks to the details of not only the forming hands then in her womb, but also to the work of that forming  “Hand”  throughout Mary’s life.

The song speaks of the outcome of one day specifically.

That being the day in the life of the one called “favored by God above all other women,”  a day decreed in which that “Hand” would allow--by a plan made, the Bible tells us, before the foundations of our world were set—in a “moment” in which “Satan’s power reigns supreme,” “a sword” thrust through  Mary’s soul. (Luke 22:53, Ibid, 2:34, respectively.)

“Mary did you know,” goes the song, “Your baby boy will one day walk on water? Mary did you know that your baby boy, will give save our sons and daughters? Did you know, your baby boy has come to make you new? Did you know, this child you are delivering will soon deliver you?”

How many a life of a young girl, young woman, gone astray, has the child in her womb, used by the Hand that formed all life and creation, be a child that makes her new, the child that that momma delivers and in so doing, in time, she herself knows “deliverance.”

Therefore, to that song, my favorite Christmas song, in my favorite rendition of that song:

A meaningful and blessed Christmas to all.

Thursday, December 17, 2015

AssWholliness: United Nazis Experts Condemn Islamophobia

AssWholliness: United Nazis Experts Condemn Islamophobia

The United Nazi experts in genocide & discrimination are
“ are  sickened  by  blatant  manifestations  of  hatred  and  intolerance,  including  by  public figures  in  response  to  terrorist  attacks  by  violent  extremists,”.

  I refuse to be sickened, I will not waste a good bowl of bean soup on their self-righteous AssWholliness. I am revolted and I raise the impudent digit of contumacious defiance.

    Terrorist attacks, those who perpetrate them and the damnable doctrines which motivate them are and must remain objects of hatred, execration, condemnation & contempt.

    Tolerance and respect, like credit, are two way streets. "Credit is given where credit is due; we pay cash and so will you." applies to tolerance and respect.  Islam and Muslims give none and earn none. They are intolerant and unworthy of respect & tolerance.  

    Allah and his slaves curse us: 2.89, 9.30. No religion will be accepted but Islam 3.85. Muslims are the best of peoples, for the people, as they bring us to Islam with chains on our necks 3.110, Bukhari 6.60.80.

    "Including  by  public figures" is an obvious reference to presidential candidates: Dr. Ben Carson, Donald Trump & Senator Ted Cruz.  

    Dr. Carson rejected the idea of electing a Muslim to the presidency and with good reason. Islam is not compatible with our constitution.   Islam denies human rights, equality and dignity.  It demands imposition of corporal punishments. It demands execution of blasphemers and apostates. It denies freedom of religion.  

    Dr. Carson called for leaving Muslim refugees in their home region, where they belong.  While terrorists have masqueraded as refugees to get into Paris and slaughter innocent people. every Muslim is an existential threat to the extent that he believes in Allah, his imperatives, threat and promise.  Keeping them out is the right thing to do.

    Donald Trump called for a moratorium on Islamic immigration, and with good reason.  Islamic migrants are an enemy fifth column, not refugees. They come as parasites and conquerers, not to assimilate.  Its Hijra, stupid; what Moe did to Yatthrib.

    Senator Ted Cruz also wants to leave the Muslims in their home region. He also called for carpet bombing ISIS.  Both with good reason.  

    Phobia implies irrational fear. There is nothing irrational about fearing and hating  those Hellbent on  our destruction, commissioned by their deity to conquer and dominate the world.   Allah commands Muslims to "strike terror", "terrify thereby" and make a "great slaughter", killing and wounding "many of them". He cast terror, giving Muslims victory thereby.  Its in their canonical books, which have been translated into our language and uploaded to the web so we can read them. Carson, Cruz & trump should read them and get a clue.  They should call the enemy what it is: Islam, not "radical Islamic terrorism", which implies the existence of an anodyne and benevolent Islam which does not exist.  3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.

    Dr. Carson, Senator Cruz & Mr. Trump have a first amendment free speech clause right to criticize and condemn Islam. So do I, and I exercise it.   The founders knew that free speech is necessary to open debate in a representative republic. We must be at liberty to learn and share the truth about existential threats including but not limited to Islam.

    Its Islam, Stupid! Allah said "fight them" Islamic law says "The caliph makes war on Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians"... and "fights all other peoples until they become Muslims"... What the Hell part of that do you damned fools not comprehend???  

    Islamic law says that the minimum annual jihad requirement is one military expedition in every year but more is better.  It says that, if jihad is neglected in a year when it is possible, all who know of the obligation are in sin. The Book Of Jihad has Imam Al-Shafi'i's  infamous fiqh is more legible form. Reasonable, open mined men of good will read it and curse Islam.

    "Particularly  the  deliberate  and  dangerous  spread  of   misinformation  and  the  manipulation  of
people’s fears and concerns for political gain.”

   Shrub & Obamination lied for political gain. Shrub said "Islam is a great religion of peace.". He lied. Islam is permanent war. Obamination said "We are not at war with Islam." Islam is waging war against us and we need to reciprocate and exterminate it.

    Dr. Carson, Senator Cruz & Mr.  Trump lie about Islam by obfuscation: they do not state the fatal facts as I have done above.  There is no "violent extremism" or "radical Islam" there is only Islam, as Moe preached and practiced it in the 7th century.

"The Special Advisers strongly and unreservedly condemn all criminal attacks by violent extremists, wherever they may take
place. They underline, however, the damaging effects of
linking such attacks to a specific population, based on its identity, as doing so has resulted in discrimination and targeting of Muslim population."

    "Violent extremists"  is an accursed lie. The attacks in Paris and San Bernardino were carried out by believing Muslims, not extremists. The words and works of the founder of Islam are  normative, not extreme. Moe set the standard; deliberately building a reputation for barbarian rapine by assassinations, pillage and genocide.

    Recent United Nazi resolutions  reaffirm "that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group,".  Who but Muslims engage in Islamic terrorism?  When you hear hoof beats, do you expect the arrival of unicorns?  When you hear of a terrorist attack, do you  assume it was carried out by Christians?  

    Terrorism is linked to Islam by its canonical books.  The Qur'an has Allah saying that he would and did cast terror, resulting in victory over Jews. Moe said that he was made victorious with terror. What the Hell part of that is  beyond your intellectual capacity to comprehend?  

    Are Mafia members discriminated against when suspected of extortion and smuggling?  Neither are Muslims discriminated against by the sure knowledge that  members of their ummah perpetrated  a  mass killing.

    Muslims must be removed and excluded from Dar ul-Harb because each one of them is a potential terrorist, only awaiting the confluence of Iman and the call to jihad.  The MINO can become a Believer and join the jihad at any time, without warning.  

    Go to "The Book Of Jihad", linked above, and read about the fard of jihad. When we retaliated against Afghanistan, it converted from fard al-kifaya to fard al-ayn. The obligation to wage war against us is now individually binding on every Muslim wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth.  Each Muslim is obligated to do whatever he can to injure  or enrage us; to punish us for not being Muslims.  Allowing the like of Syed  Farook to reside among us is suicidal  insanity.

"The Special Advisers recalled that any “advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to  discrimination, hostility or violence” is prohibited under international  human rights law and by the  national laws or constitutions of many countries."

    I call CamelShit! When Geert  Wilders published Fitna, Ban Ki-moon used that malignant language to condemn it as incitement to  hatred and violence. Arrogant AssWholes equate exposure of evil with evil.  Wilders simply shows you the Qur'an verses that incite hatred & violence  and the Imams who rouse the rabble by preaching them in their mosques.

ICERD, ICCPR & CPPCG require that Islam be proscribed by law for
violating human rights,  warmongering & inciting genocide, but  the Secretary General wants to ban Fitna instead.
Reuters quotes U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon about Fitna:"There is no justification for hate speech or incitement to violence," Ban said in a statement. "The right of free expression is not at stake here."

In  recent  weeks,  there  have  been  numerous  acts  of  intimidation  and  violence  against  Muslims and  Muslim  sites,  including  vandalism  of  mosques  as  well  as  discriminatory,  xenophobic  and racist statements.  Some  of  these statements  have  referred  to  all  Muslims - and  all refugees  and asylum seekers originating from Syria and Iraq - as “terrorists.”

    There is no excuse for unprovoked insult & assault against anyone, Muslim or not. There is no excuse for vandalism & arson.  Those are crimes. I neither advocate nor incite them.  If mentally unstable individuals commit such acts when outraged about Islamic terrorism, that is not the fault of those of us who expose it.  

    Islam is not a race. You can not change your race. Ayaan Hirsi Ali remains Black after apostatizing. Dougie Hooper remains White after reverting. Race is immaterial to the issue at hand. AssWholes play the race card as a tool for squelching debate.

    Islam began as an Arab Mafia but it conquered and subsumed Asians, Blacks and Caucasians. Its multi racial.  Exposing, condemning and objecting to Islam is not racist.  There is no element of bigotry or racism in fact based declarations that Muslims should not be admitted to America or elected to high office.

    Christian and Yazidi refugees from Iraq & Syria are not terrorists. Muslims are.  Muslims are obligated to obey Allah and emulate his Messenger.  Allah commanded them to "strike terror", "terrify" prospective enemies and "fight those of the disbelievers nearest you.  Moe was "made victorious with terror".  Muslims are told in 33.21, to emulate him. Obedient Muslims are terrorists. Islam entails terrorism. AssWholes, like LibTards and other analencephalopaths, can't comprehend that because they do not use their brains.

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, mastermind of the second WTC attack, said it best in his "Response To  The Nine Accusations".

Therefore, killing you and fighting you, destroying you and  terrorizing you, responding back to your attacks, are all considered to be great legitimate duty in our religion.

    What part of  terrorizing you is a great legitimate duty in Islam do you not comprehend?!

"Refugees from Syria and Iraq are fleeing precisely
the kind of violence that we in the West also fear. To turn
them away when they are seeking refuge is an affront to our common humanity.”

    The AssWholes played the guilt card. Two of the terrorists who attacked Paris were "Syrian refugees" .   That is ample cause for telling them to stay home.

"At this time when the world is facing complex challenges, including confronting extremist violent groups and individuals, Governments and other leading actors in society should publiclycounter lies, prejudice and fear”

    Islam is the violent group; the rest are subsets of Islam, undifferentiated from it in any significant way.  This blog post is countering lies & prejudice with facts.  Fear is a natural result of terrorism, both the end and the means  Muslims seek to impose.  That fear must motivate citizens to demand that Islam be outlawed and Muslims  expelled and excluded.

    Current immigration law permits exclusion of subversive and violent enemies. The  constitution is not a suicide pact. Freedom of religion does not extend to attacking, killing, enslaving, plundering, raping and enslaving non-believers, all of which are entailed by Islam. Where you find the right to perform such acts, there you will find the right to manifest, practice & propagate Islam; not in our constitution!

Sunday, December 13, 2015

“verily I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) [said]; (Nay, not so) but a Muslim.”

“verily I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) [said]; (Nay, not so) but a Muslim.” 

Seed thought: What is a Muslim? What is a believer? Is there a difference between the two? Additionally, what does Islam demand of the Muslim, the believer?

Following, the words of the men of wisdom in Islam, and the words of the alleged founder of Islam, so too, the words of a former Muslim, respond in full to the above queries:

Sa’d narrated it on the authority of his father (Abi Waqqas) who said: The Messenger of Allah (SAW) distributed shares (of booty amongst his Companions). I said: Messenger of Allah! Give it to so and so for verily he is a believer.  The Apostle of Allah said: Or a Muslim? I (the narrator) repeated it (the word “believer”) thrice and he (the Holy Prophet) turned it back upon me (and substituted the word ) “Muslim”….

(Sahih Muslim, By Imam Muslim, Rendered in English by ‘Abdul Hamid Siddiqi, Islamic Book Service, Fourth Edition, 2005, Vol. I, Kitab Al-Iman, P. 124-125. [#150].)

The hadith that follows the above hadith reads this way:

It was narrated on the authority of Sa’d that the Messenger of Allah (SAW) bestowed upon a group of persons (things), and Sa’d was sitting amongst them. Sa’d said: The Messenger of Allah ignored some of them. And he who was ignored appeared to be more deserving in my eyes (as compared with others). I (Sa’d) said: Messenger of Allah! Why is it you did not give to such and such (man)? Verily I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (saw)said: Or a Muslim? I kept quiet for some time but I was again impelled (to express) what I knew about him. I said: Messenger of Allah!  Why is it you did not give to such and such (man)?  Verily, by Allah, I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) said: (Nay, not a believer) but a Muslim. He (Sa’d) said: I again kept quiet for some time but what I knew about him  again impelled me (to express my opinion) and I said: Why is it that you did not give (the share) to so and so: By Allah, verily I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) [said] ; (Nay, not so) but a Muslim.”  (Ibid, P. 125, [#150R1].)

Footnotes thereat provide the following exegesis on the above-cited ahadith: “ A muslim [sic] is he who makes profession of Islam, but the believer is one who  believes in Islam from the depth of his heart.” (Ibid.)

The exegesis further asserts, deducing from the ahadith, that not always is a muslim a believer, but always is a believer a muslim.
Hence this: “And if any fail to judge by the light of what Allah has revealed, they are no better than unbelievers.”  (Qur’an 5:47) In other words, if they fail to judge by what Allah has revealed they are not Believers but rather unbelievers.

Therefore this: “No, by your Lord, they are not believers until they make you their judge in the disputes that break out between them, and then find no resistance, (nor any doubt or constriction), within themselves to what you decide but submit themselves completely (and will obey your judgments without question).

(An-Nisa [4:65], Tafsir Al-Jalalayn,  Jalalu’ D-Din Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Al-Mahalli and Jalalu’ D-Din as-Suyuti, Aisha Bewley’s Translation , Dar Al Taqwa Ltd. London, 2007.)

Hence this: “It is narrated on the authority of Al-‘Abbas b. ‘Abdul-Muttalib that he heard the Messenger of Allah saying: He relished the flavour [sic] of faith that who became pleased with Allah as Lord, with al-Islam as a code of life and with Muhammad as a Messenger (of Allah). (Muslim, Ibid. P. 57, [# 34].)

On behalf of the revered scholars of Islam, footnotes thereat read as follows:

Sincere attachment to Allah, Islam and the Holy Prophet is the sum and substance of faith….It is an attitude of mind which is formed by willing adherence to Allah, His Apostle and the code of life which he has given to the human race….

To be pleased with Al-Islam as the code of life implies that whatever Islam has laid down for a believer by way of spiritual guidance or practical legislation should be looked upon as the timeless expression of God’s will and should be willingly and cheerfully put into practice.

To be pleased with Muhammad (SAW) as the Messenger of Allah is indicative of the fact that it is through Muhammad that God’s will has been made known to us. He is the bearer of revelation and is, therefore, best fitted and divinely authorized to tell the human race how Allah is to be loved and obeyed and how his pleasure can be rightly sought for and how his laws can be applied in practical life. Thus without showing obedience to Muhammad and following him sincerely and earnestly we cannot obey our Lord. (Ibid. FN, #3, 4, 5, respectively.)

For such reasons, with confidence, the so-called Messenger of Allah declared, “None of you is a believer till I am dearer to him than his child, his father, and the whole of mankind.” (Ibid, P. 62, [#44R1].)

Therefore, this exegesis on the above just-cited hadith from the men of knowledge in Islam:

“…the Holy Prophet ….in his personality … we can know the will of the Lord….He has been, therefore, made for us the focus of loyalty because it is through him that we have learnt the true concept of God, the real implications of Tauhid, the role of man …. In fact the whole of the religion. It is Muhammad (SAW)… He is [sic] central figure in Islam: that is the reason why the Qur’an says, “ If you love Allah, follow me: Allah will love you….” (Ibid, FN #1.)

Therefore this command: “O you who believe, raise not your voices above the Prophet’s voice, nor speak loudly to him….”(49:2.)

Therefore, this exegesis on that just-cited Qur’anic verse: “ The scholars of Islam have stated in connection with this verse that here voice also means opinion and judgement and no Muslim is allowed to consider his judgement and opinion to be more sound and correct in comparison to the verdict of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him). (Ibid. Muslim, Vol. IV. P.94, FN.)

Hence, the Qur’an instructs, “Obey Allah and the Messenger so that perhaps you will gain mercy.” (3: 132.) It tells us, “Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah.” (4:80.) It warns, “Those who [disagree and oppose] Allah and His Messenger will be subdued and overcome as those before them were also subdued and overcome [when they opposed their Messengers before]…. The unbelievers will have a humiliating punishment.” (58: 5)

(Tafsir Al-Jalalayn,  Jalalu’ D-Din Muhammad Ibn Ahmad Al-Mahalli , Jalalu’ D-Din as-Siyuti, Aisha Bewley’s Translation, Dar Al Taqwa Ltd. 2007.)

Hence, with confidence, the Messenger of Allah asserted, “Whoever obeys me, obeys Allah, and whoever disobeys me, disobeys Allah.”  (Sahih.)

(Sunan Ibn Majah, English Translation, Compiled by: Imam Muhammad Bin Yazeed Ibn Majah Al-Qazwini, Ahadith edited & referenced by: Hafiz Abu Tahir Zubair ‘Ali Za’I, Translated by: Nasiruddin al-Khattab [Canada], Final review by: Abu Khaliyl [USA], Darussalam. Vol. 4, P 101, #2859.)

That provided, we move forward: last week, on Mark’s Levin’s show, I heard him interview Andy McCarthy. In that interview, McCarthy made solid arguments in defense of the “Trump Call” with respect to Muslims.

Having heard Mark mention an article McCarthy had written on the subject, having great respect for both, McCarthy and his work, I chased the article down (link to it provided below). Read it. Agreed with it in many instances.

However, with respect to the idea McCarthy seems to support, what I call the myth of two Islams--one that the “extremist” follow, the other, the one the Moderates follow; therefore, the myth that, with respect to Believers in the way of Muhammad, there are Moderates and Extremist—that I strongly disagree with. 
Because as long as we allow that myth life; then here in our nation, Islamic  schools will teach the children the of the “Believers” the tenets of the only Islam there is, which is the Islam I have studied since 9/11, the Islam the “sacred Texts” of Islam disclose, the Islam the “Prophet Muhammad” brought, lived and defined.

Therefore, as is always so, to check my thoughts against not only the best-versed on Islam, but also against one born and raised in both an Islamic nation and community, I was thankful to have at e-mail’s length, the input of my mentor in Islam, former Bangladeshi Muslim, “Abul Kasem.” He is one born and raised in the faith he now—as he has done for the past two decades of more—with his “pen, and, I note, his needed pen-name, via the net, teaches and exposes true basic Islam. And to stay alive, with the recent chopping to death of “anti-Islam” Bangladeshi former Muslim bloggers, AK dares not visit his homeland.

Many readers of Jihad Watch very likely have read his work at Islam Watch: the work of “Abul Kasim.”

Because AK is not only my mentor in Islam, but has also become a friend I cherish, one whose input on Islam I count as second to none, I quickly sent him the above-mentioned article, requested he comment on it.

Here follows, those comments:

Dear DL;

I am replying in a hurry, because we are going on a holiday trip.

The shortest answer will be:

It is impossible to have moderate Muslims in the absence of a moderate Quran.

Those who claim to be moderate are actually hypocrites and opportunists, dishonest and practice takiyya and kitman. Actually, they are more dangerous than the Jihadists.

Good Muslims are the ones who are honest, and truly live by the words of the Quran and Sunna.
Those veering from the above tenets are bad Muslims--or not Muslims at all. But they are afraid to declare their apostasy for fear of facing the wrath of good Muslims.

 Much of what is stated the in the essay is true and shows the scope and ferocity of Islam.

Donald Trump's idea deserves some merit.  The only point is that he should distinguish between bad Muslims and good Muslims. I think, US should only accept very bad Muslims--. Allowing these bad Muslims protection for their apostasy. They will be allies. The US must stop admitting the good and moderate Muslims.



Thank you, Abul. To our peril we disregard his words.

That stated, to the above and to this conversation I add the following:

Too often among us, well-intended regard-worthy individuals, but individuals, nonetheless, less then deep-versed on Islam, assert—in the words of the inimitable regard-worthy American treasure, Mark Levin—“Shari ‘ah Law is incompatible with a constitutional Republic,” which is a categorical correct indisputable provable assertion; but they fail to realize Shari ‘ah is Islam.

Islam is Qur’an and Sunnah, and the consensus of the scholars, as long as that consensus agrees in full with the former; congruently—as in “coinciding on all points when superimposed”--Shari ‘ah is Qur’an and Sunnah, and the consensus of the scholars, as long as that consensus agrees in full with Qur’an and Sunnah. Failing that accordance there is no consensus, there is no Shari ‘ah.

Islam is Shari ‘ah, Shari ‘ah is Islam.

And of Shari ‘ah Levin additionally accurately asserted, not only is it “incompatible with a constitutional Republic,” but, “Shari ‘ah must be used to impose the will of that faith on all countries and on all peoples.” (Levin show, 10 December 2014: 47:20.)

Yes, Indeed, Levin, and Shari ‘ah is Islam—there is no daylight, between them because they are one and the same.

Hence this Qur’anic exegesis from revered Islamic works:

The Authority of the Holy Prophet extends to all times …. The verdict of the sacred Law left by him, is nothing but his own verdict. Therefore, the rule reigns supreme right through the Last Day, the rule that guidance should be sought by turning directly to the Holy Prophet, during his blessed lifetime, and after him, one must turn to his Shariah which is, in all reality, a return to him, may Allah bless him for ever and ever.

(Mariful Qur’an, A Comprehensive commentary on the Holy Qur’an, By Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi, translated by, Muhammad Shamim and Muhammad Wali Raazi, Revised by Maulana Muhammad Taqi ‘Usmani, Fourth Edition, 2007, Maktaba-e-Darul- ‘Uloom, Karachi, 14 Pakistan. Vol. 2, P. 487)

“Moderates,” “Reformers” assert they reject the doctrine of stoning for adultery. They reject the doctrine of death for the apostate to Islam, they reject violent jihad, they reject the doctrine of the Caliphate, the ruling of Shari ‘ah, and on and on, naming one after the other of the doctrines and traditions of the “prophet of Islam”—Sunnah! Sunnah that Islam claims is equal to Qur’an, part of “what Allah has revealed.”

Surely, these “Moderates” and “Reformers” know, rejecting sunnah, Islam asserts, is tantamount to apostasy. It is repudiating Islam in its entirety.

Self-claimed so-called “Moderates” and/or “Reformer” Muslims state, the Qur’an, and their “prophet,” in numerous passages and incidents, provide good peaceable guidance. Indeed, no argument there--where the guidance in the Qur’an and the same in the sunnah of their “prophet” provides guidance and instructions from the unaltered teachings of the Hebrew Scripture and of the New Testament, such is indeed, minimally, good guidance.

The problem is Islam disallows the believer to choose which words, practices, and judgments of their “prophet” they wish to follow and which they elect to repudiate and disregard. 

Once more, heed the words of the revered scholars of Islam:

“The explanatory role of the Sunnah in relation to the Qur’an has been determined by the Qur’an itself, where we read in an address to the Prophet in sura al-Nahl (16:44): ‘We have sent down to you the Remembrance so that you may explain to the people what has been revealed to them.”

(Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence, Dr. Mohammad Hasim Kamali, The Islamic Texts Society, UK, 2003, p. 81)

Tasfir Al-Jalalyn renders and amplifies the just cited allegedly Allah to Muhammad communication this way: “We have sent down the reminder [(The Qur’an)] to you so that you may make clear to mankind what has been sent down to them [regarding the lawful and unlawful--] so that perhaps they will reflect [on that and take note].

In other words, according to Qur’anic teaching, Allah  elected to use the life of “his messenger” Muhammad to show “believers” the actions Allah wanted to see in and from his body of Believers, which were actions seen and enacted in the life of “His Messenger, Muhammad”; acts of others praised by the same.

Because, as spoken to in earlier citations herein, “it is through Muhamad that God’s will has been made known to us,” assert the revered Islamic scholars. “He is the bearer of revelation and,” therefore, teaches, via his life, the believer what acts earn “Allah’s pleasure” and approval, and “how his laws can be applied in , practical life. “ (Muslim. Vol. I, FN.)

For that reason, this assertion and warning in the revered work of Maulana Mufti Muhammad Shafi’s, Mariful Qur’an tasfir, expounding on that same verse, under the heading, “ Hadith is Necessary to Understand Qur’an: The Rejection of Hadith is Really the Rejection of the Qur’an."

He follows that warning up with the following:

“And We sent down the Message (adh-dhikr: The Qur’an) so that you explain to the people,” means, by consensus, the Holy Qur’an—and, in this verse, the Holy Prophet has been given the assignment of explaining the meaning of verses revealed to him before people. Herein lies an open proof that the correct understanding of the realities, insights and injunctions of the Holy Qur’an depends on the statement of the Prophet of Islam, Muhammad al-Mustafa…..

In Al-Muwafqat, Allamah Shatibi has provided detailed proof that the Sunnah of the Holy Prophet, the whole of it, is the explanation of the Book of Allah because the Qur’an has said about the Holy Prophet (And surely you are at the height of a sublime nature [64:4]) and which was explained by Sayyidah ‘Aishah by saying: (The Qur’an was his sublime nature). Thus, the outcome is that every word and deed which provenly [sic] issued forth from the Holy Prophet is nothing but what was said by the Qur’an….This is because according to  the clarification of the Qur’an nothing he says is prompted by his personal desire, instead, it is a Wahy (revelation) from Allah Ta ‘ala: (and nor does he talk from desire. It is nothing but a revelation revealed—[ 53: 3-4]) This tells us that all acts of worship, dealings with people, personal morals and habits of the Holy Prophet were, all of them, through Divine revelation and have the same authority as that of the Qur’an. 

(Mariful Qur’an,Vol. 5, [16: 43-44], P. 363-364.)

In other words, as the Qur’an bears out, according to Islam, Muhammad was sent to explain that in the Qur’an to humanity; to provide, via his life, words, approval, and disapproval; clarity on all messages and tenets contained in the Qur’an. We find most of those clarifications and object lessons in ahadith, sira, and tafsir. Also in fiqh—jurisprudence, because the Qadis and Scholars that have contributed to that in Islamic Jurisprudence, have only been allowed to contribute to Islamic Law (Shariah) that which agrees in full with that found in the former sources—Qur’anic, ahadith, sira, tafsir.

For that reason, “No, by your Lord, they are not believers until they make you their judge in the disputes that break out between them, and then find no resistance, (nor any doubt or constriction), within themselves to what you decide but submit themselves completely (and will obey your judgments without question). (An-Nisa [4:65],Tafsir Al-Jalalayn.)

For such reasons, as spoken to in the opening line of this post, “verily,” asserted Sa’d ibn Waqqas, “I see him a believer. The Messenger of Allah (SAW) [said] ; (Nay, not so) but a Muslim.” 

“No, by your Lord, they will not believe until they ask you to judge between them in what they disagree about and then they shall find in themselves no impediment touching your verdict, but shall surrender in full submission.” (4:64)

Thus this addition, per Muhammad ibn at-Tirmidhi: “ ‘To take the Messenger as a model means to emulate him, follow his sunna and abandon opposition to him in either word or action.’ Several commentators said words to that effect.”

(Qadi ‘Iyad Ibn Musa al-Yasubi, Muhammad Messenger of Allah, Aisha Abdarrahman Bewley translation, Medinah Press, Cape Town, South Africa, Seventh print, 2008, 1429H, p. 217.)

Endless are the texts from authoritative Islamic sources that substantiate and corroborate my above assertions. Nonetheless, for the sake of brevity here, in this post, aiming to wind this up, I limit that from the established word of Qur’an and Sunnah to the following example of the indispensable necessity for all believers to accept, to the negation of all other opinions and rulings, the judgement, the guidance, the opinion of the “prophet.”

Why such focus on this man’s life?

For the reasons borne out above: if we are to know what to expect from the life of believers in the “religion” of Muhammad that live among us and elsewhere, we must study and know Muhammad’s actions, because, it is those actions, all of them, every believer is Allah-ordered to obey and mimic.

Therefore, to what I call, “Object Lesson, Bishr.”

As narrated “from Sayyidna ‘Abdullah ibn Abbas as narrated by Tha ‘labi and Ibn Abi Hatim,” the incident of Bishr and  Sayyidna  Umar ibn al-Khattab.

“Bishr [‘who called himself a Muslim’] … got into a dispute with a Jew,” the report states and “The Jew said, ‘let us go to Muhammad and let him settle our dispute.’”  (Mariful Qur’an, Vol. 2, p. 481.)

The narrative relates Bishr (whom the narrative calls “a pretending Muslim”) then posed a “counter-proposal” to the Jews suggestion, suggesting they rather seek the judgment of Jewish tribal chief, Ka ‘b ibn Ashraf, who was, no less, “a sworn enemy of the Holy Prophet and his Muslim followers.” After further discussion on the matter, the two men finally agreed upon the original suggestion of the Jew—seek the verdict of the “Prophet.”

Thus, they did just that. The “Prophet” gave his decision in the favor of the Jew. That, of course, left Bishr dissatisfied. His dissatisfaction thereat spurred him to suggest yet another option: take the case to Umar, one well known for his harshness on unbelievers.

Tafsir tells, the two “reached Sayyadna Umar.”  The Jew relayed all the details of the case to Umar, as well as informing him, they had already submitted the case to the Prophet, received his verdict on it, but how Bishr was dissatisfied with the Prophet’s verdict.

Upon hearing such, Umar “asked Bishr, ‘Is this what really happened?’” Bishr confirmed such was so. At that point, Umar instructed the two to wait right where they stood. Turning on his heels, he went to his house, and tafsir provides, Umar returned “with a sword which he swung to finish the hypocrite off, saying: ‘this is the decision for him who is dissatisfied with the decision of the Holy Prophet.’” (ibid, p.482.)

(Tafsir al-Jalalayn relays the same account, stating, “so ‘Umar killed him.” Tafsir ibn Kathir puts Umar’s actions in highlight here this way: “’Umar … struck the head of the man who rejected the Prophet’s decision with the sword and killed him.”


The narrative goes on to tell, how when the relatives of Bishr heard about the incident, they filed a suit against Umar accusing him of wrongfully killing a Muslim—“without adequate legal authority as admitted by the Shariah of Islam.” (ibid.)

The narrative tells that in time, after Bishr’s defenders presented all their arguments in the court of the Prophet, Allah revealed, all those were simply “an exercise in lying,” and the fact that Bishr rejected the prophets verdict  proved Bishr not only a hypocrite but a clear apostate. Thus, “his being killed by Sayyidna Umar became all the more justified.” (ibid.)

That narrative goes on to provide, Umar was absolved of any wrong doing, because, Allah provided  the grounds of justification on which Umar killed the so-called Muslim—the fact that Bishr rejected the verdict of the Prophet proved Bishr not a true Muslim but rather an apostate. Thus, the treatment Umar gave him qualified as Umar simply carrying out Allah’s orders.

It goes on to state, when Allah thus revealed, “Those are the ones Allah knows what is in their hearts. So ignore what they are and give them good counsel and speak to them about themselves,” (ibid, vs 63) in that, Allah instructed the Prophet to “ignore their excuses and reject their charge of excess against Sayyidna Umar.”

Again, in Umar’s above actions, “Allah,” via “the Prophet” clearly exonerating Umar of any wrongdoing. (MQ, V. II, PP. 481 – 485.)

Additionally, using, if you will, the Bishr object lesson, Allah then instructed his Messenger to advise them, warn them (“the rest of the hypocrites”), should they ever be inclined to do as Bishr had done and bypass, reject, be dissatisfied with the judgment of the Prophet, they too “might as well meet the same fate as did Bishr, the hypocrite.” (ibid.)

Thus the next verse revealed buttresses those cited above, with Allah warning and declaring, “We did not send any Messenger but to be obeyed by the leave of Allah” [4: 64]. Tafsir provides the following clarification for the verse:

It means that any Messenger who was sent by Allah was sent so that everyone obeys the rules set by him in accordance with the command of Allah Almighty. In that case, the inevitable consequence [of rejecting those rules] will be that anyone who opposes the rules set by the Messenger will be dealt with in the manner disbelievers are dealt with.

How, in the Bishr object lesson was this disbeliever dealt with? With the sword--wacked to death.

Thus, tafsir adds, “Therefore, whatever Sayyidna Umar did turned out to be correct.” (ibid.)

Did we get that?

Umar killed the man that was dissatisfied with the verdict of Muhammad;  Allah and his Messenger exonerated Umar in that murder. On the heels of it, Allah further advised his Messenger to use this incident to warn others perhaps inclined to do as Bishr had done. Thus, the ummah has as their pattern and guide on what to do with such “offences,” this Umar example, which Allah, the Prophet, thus Qur’an, Sunnah, and thus Islam, declare correct and thus assert Umar righteous in his act therein.

Some may argue, but the danger of earning the “Bishr reward” for rejecting the verdict of the Prophet ended with the Prophet’s death. Not so.

Tafsir is clear on that. So too, Qur’an and Sunnah. As spoken to above, as we will re-read here shortly.

For that reason the Qur’an states, just a few verses after those spotlighted above, “Whoever obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah. (vs. 80.) That precept the Qur’an and ahadith echo throughout. One can in fact state, absent that basis precept, Islam collapses.

In other words, Islam is just that—following the judgments, teachings, advice and examples of the Arabian Prophet. And that is precisely what Muslims who are also Believers in the way of Muhammad do.

Once more in closing: “So never, by your Lord, never shall they become believers unless they make you the judge in the disputes which arise between them, then find no discomfort in their hearts against what you have decided and surrender to it in total submission. (4: 65)

Tafsir provides clarification on that stating, “Not accepting the decision of the Prophet is Kufr.”

(kufr: disbelief, to cover up the truth, to reject Allah and refuse to believe that Muhammad is His Messenger.)

(A Glossary of Islamic Terms, Aisha Bewley, Ta-Ha Publishers, LTD, 2009, p. 13.)

Tafsir further clarifies, “Allah Almighty proclaims that nobody can become a Muslim unless he accepts the verdict of the Holy Prophet willingly, calmly, and fully to the extent that there remains even in his heart not the slightest strain because of this verdict.” (Mariful Qur’an, ibid [Vol.II], p. 487.)
That seems rather clear. 

Tafsir goes on to state, because the “Holy Prophet is not only the ruler of the state, he is a Messenger of Allah, protected against sins by Him,” as such, the believer, if a true Muslim at all, is “duty bound to make the Holy Prophet the arbitrator and judge and have him give the final verdict.” Then it adds, “And once the verdict has been given by him, let them all accept it whole-heartedly [sic] and act accordingly.” (Mariful Qur’an, ibid, p. 487.)

As mentioned above, one may argue the authority of the “Prophet’s” verdicts ended with his death. As stated above, not so. As Qur’an and Sunnah assert consistently. Once more therefore to Qur’anic tafsir:

The Authority of the Holy Prophet extends to all times …. The verdict of the sacred Law left by him, is nothing but his own verdict. Therefore, the rule reigns supreme right through the Last Day, the rule that guidance should be sought by turning directly to the Holy Prophet, during his blessed lifetime, and after him, one must turn to his Shariah which is, in all reality, a return to him, may Allah bless him for ever and ever. (MQ, V. 2, P. 487)

The above presented, I name just a few high-profile examples we have of Good Muslim, Believers in the way of Muhammad: Osama bin Ladin, Nidal Hasan, the SB killing-couple;  the Leaders, soldiers, scholars and patrons of Islamic State, just to name a few.

Why did the above named commit the acts of Jihad they committed? Because they were, are, good Muslims, true believers in the way of Muhammad, thus, obedient to the dictates and tenets of Islam, thus conformers to Sunnah. 

Concluding here, I so re-citing these words of my friend Abul:

Good Muslims are the ones who are honest, and truly live by the words of the Quran and Sunna. Those veering from the above tenets are bad Muslims--or not Muslims at all. But they are afraid to declare their apostasy for fear of facing the wrath of good Muslims.


Donald Trump's idea deserves some merit.  The only point is that he should distinguish between bad Muslims and good Muslims. I think, US should only accept very bad Muslims--. Allowing these bad Muslims protection for their apostasy. They will be allies. The US must stop admitting the good and moderate Muslims.

To our peril we disregard Abul’s advice.

Friday, December 11, 2015

If the challenge Trump has tabled is allowed to come to fruition, it will take us directly to the so-called “sacred” Islamic text

Earlier this week, in the wake of the most recent high-profile acts of believers of the Islamic faith obeying Allah, thus, obeying the command of the central figure of Islam, its alleged “prophet,” Donald Trump called for a "total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States."

He asserted, "Without looking at the various polling data, it is obvious to anybody the hatred is beyond comprehension." He added, "Where this hatred comes from and why we will have to determine. Until we are able to determine and understand this problem and the dangerous threat it poses, our country cannot be the victims of horrendous attacks by people that believe only in Jihad, and have no sense of reason or respect for human life."

He stated, “What's happened is we're out of control. We have no idea who's coming into our country. We have no idea if they love us or if they hate us.”

He added to the above, speaking of “Muslims” he knows, “they know we have a problem. They know we have a real problem.” Trump thus asserted, “We can't put up with it, folks.”

Therefore, he calls for a “complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on.”

We must find out—and then deal honestly with that that we do discover, I add--Trump argued, “Where the hatred comes from and why … we're going to have to figure it out. We have to figure it out,” he presses.

He argues, “We can't live like this. It's going to get worse and worse. You're going to have more World Trade Centers. It's going to get worse and worse, folks.


Small wonder thus, on the Left, on the Right, the “Lions” among them have risen.

Stirred they are, roused from their swooning and slumbering in the face of the source of the Islamic plot and threat against us; at the notion, at the gull, that anyone would dare table the idea, we seek, find and address the reason for the drive behind the jihadist that attack our nation, kill our loved ones, ravish our peace.

Damn the Soul! They cry. Damn the man, the notion, and all beings in support of him and it!

How dare anyone do such a despicable thing! How dare one!

And what makes it all the more “reprehensible” and “un-American” is, it is not just anyone who made the above suggestion, it is—all but beyond belief!—one, a Candidate for the office of the U.S. Presidency.

Therefore, not the least bit surprising, Senator Lindsey Graham insinuated, he was willing to do his level best to see to it, that,  should Trump somehow become the Nominee on the Republican ticket, Hilary wins the national election.

Because, as Lindsey put it, it is one thing to lose an election but quite another to lose honor.

In speaking of the said lost honor, I’ve little, if any, doubt Graham speaks with the absence of first-hand experience of the bitter taste of lost honor suffered and, what we deduce from his statements, is and would be the sweetness of “Hillary.”


Therefore, given the uproar and the “Give us Hillary!” (“Give us Barabbas!) moment that the Right is now convulsing in; because I know, if the challenge Trump has tabled is allowed to come to fruition, it will take us directly to the so-called “sacred” Islamic text; I press we go there.

Because all—which are many—who have done so know the truth Congress--Left and Right--as well as the office of the US Presidency seek to obfuscate: the reason for the hatred is in the said texts.

They know, if the challenge Trump has tabled is allowed to come to fruition, it will take us directly into the pages of Qur’an, the pages of sira, the pages of regarded Islamic tafsir, and into the volumes, chapters, pages and lines of ahadith.

Our elected officials know, that written in the said text will stand, and on its own, testify to the reason for the hatred in heart, mind, and soul in the believer in the way of Muhammad. All who have made their journey into the so-called “sacred texts” of Islam, they know, that written there eradicates both question and puzzlement with respect to the message therein.

Yet our elected Representatives all but call for Trumps immediate binded-haul to the guillotine—because they believe we must respect Islam’s so-called “Holy Book,” thus, so too, its “Holy Prophet.”

But that is a “respect” we can ill-afford to render.

Moreover, I solemnly warn, should we continue rendering respect to the doctrine of Islam, and thus protecting that therein from being put, spotlighted, on center stage; that “respect” rendered will be the death of this nation—time to write “Ichabod” on District of Columbus signs. Hang the same in New York Harbor.

Tuesday, December 08, 2015

Trump: Ban Muslims

Trump: Ban Muslims Full disclosure: I am a Cruz supporter; I do not trust Donald Trump.  I am not pleased with Senator Cruz's response to Donald Trump's proposal to block the entry of Muslims.

    Contrary to popular opinion and tradition, Islam is not a legitimate religion. Islam is a way of life: intra-species predation which has a religious component. The "original religion of Islam" is Jihad.  Jihad is "war against non-Muslims" with full force of military arms

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam. This list contains the most relevant ayat & ahadith; please click through and read each of them.
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220
    I doubt that either Cruz or Trump has read the Qur'an and Sahih Bukhari. I urge all presidential aspirants to read them and to sample Reliance Of The Traveller.  

    In the top frame of this blog, you will find a link to Islam 101 For Politicians. Please send that link to your favorite candidate.  That page contains embedded pdf files with quotes from and links to the canonical texts essential to understanding Islam.

    Islam stands alone, without modifiers. Islam is neither moderate, extreme, peaceful nor radical. It is Islam, Stupid!  It is what Moe preached and practiced 1400 years ago: the Qur'an & sunnah, which are codified in Islamic law.  

    Islam has five pillars and a peak, which you never hear about.  Jihad is the highest peak of Islam.  There is nothing more important in Islam than Jihad.

    Radical, radicalism & radicalization are false memes contrived to prevent us from understanding the reality of Islam. Allah is a slave master who demands that his slaves obey his commands which include:
    Muslims are of two types: hypocrites, in whose hearts there is a disease, who lag behind when Believers do Jihad, and Believers who fight in Allah's cause, killing and being killed.  A MINO can become a Believer and do Jihad at any time, without warning.

    On Judgment Day, each Muslim will face Allah, who will hold a scale, weighing the Muslim's sins against his good deeds. The tilt of the balance determines the Muslim's eternal destiny: fire or orgy.  But Allah, in his mercy, promises Muslims Brownie Points for acts intended to injure or enrage disbelievers. Terrorism is imputed to the terrorist's credit as a righteous good deed!

    Muslim immigration is hijra: emulation of Moe's subversion of Yatthrib, which he renamed Medina.  They come to conquer, not to assimilate.  

    The only sure way to prevent Islamic terrorism is to isolate Muslims from us: to expel and exclude them from Dar ul-Harb.  Leave them in or send them back to sand land, where they belong.

    This is not a racial issue.  While Islam began as an Arab Mafia, it has conquered and subsumed members of several races. Apostates and converts do not change races, they change affiliations.  'Rass your racist canard!

    Phobias are irrational fears.  When a  war crime syndicate murders 270 million people in 1400 years, fearing & loathing it is not irrational, its common sense. 'Rass your Islamophobia canard!

    The Constitution is not a suicide pact. The First Amendment's Free Exercise clause is for religions, not war crimes. Where you find a right  to  attack, kill, enslave, extort, plunder and rape, there you will find the right to manifest, practice & propagate Islam, there and nowhere in the Constitution!
    If the assailant's parents had stayed put in Pakistan, his victims would be alive and healthy today.  14 are dead and 21 wounded because we allow Muslims to immigrate.   Donald Trump is factually correct, not politically correct. He has the right idea, but I doubt that he knows why.  Because I want you to know, I include links to  further details.
        You or your friends may "know"  Muslims who are "wonderful people".  Really?  They may be MINOs for the time being, or they may be Believers exercising their license to deceive you.  But we have neither Muslim friends nor allies. Allah explicitly forbids Muslims from being in inferior and equal relationships with kuffar.  Search the Qur'an for "take not" and  "as friends". 3.28 is not the only instance, you will find more in Surahs 4, 5 & 9.

    In his Dec. 8 '15 show, Mark Levin had an excellent rant about the Trump proposal and reactions to it. He also talked with Andrew McCarthy and Senator Ted Cruz. Please go to his web site and listen to the show.

Monday, December 07, 2015

Obamination: ISIL Terrorism Strategy

Obamination: ISIL Terrorism Strategy Seventy four years ago, FDR reacted to the attack on Pearl Harbor, demanding a declaration of war.  Seventy years ago, Harry Truman ended that war by nuking Hiroshima & Nagasaki.  How sad it is that their successors in office are incapable of learning from their historical examples.

    December 6, '15, Obamination spewed shit in response to the San Bernardino Massacre.  That pile of excrement follows, with my contemptuous commentary in block quotes.

Good evening. On Wednesday, 14 Americans were killed as they came together to celebrate the holidays. They were taken from family and friends who loved them deeply. They were white and black; Latino and Asian; immigrants and American-born; moms and dads; daughters and sons. Each of them served their fellow citizens and all of them were part of our American family.

Nobody can feel the afflictive dispensation of bereavement and injury as intensely as those directly involved. Obamination exploits their grief and pain for political gain, a damnable act of AssWholliness.

Tonight, I want to talk with you about this tragedy, the broader threat of terrorism, and how we can keep our country safe.

The massacre happened because our government allowed enemy combatants to form a fifth column on our soil. No Muslims, no massacre.  That is all we need to know about it. 

    The threat of terrorism: "I will cast terror." Terror, in this context, implies inescaable impending doom such that children turn grey, nursing mothers abandon their infants and pregnant women drop their loads.  

     In modern military strategy, that of Pakistan, it means both the ends and the means, the state they wish to impose. 

    The government can do nothing to keep us safe because we are not safe. Muslims lurk among us. We will not be safe until they are expelled and excluded.

The FBI is still gathering the facts about what happened in San Bernardino, but here is what we know. The victims were brutally murdered and injured by one of their coworkers and his wife. So far, we have no evidence that the killers were directed by a terrorist organization overseas, or that they were part of a broader conspiracy here at home. 

The terrorists were directed and motivated by the damnable words of Allah, aka Satan, spoken by Moe 1400 years ago. 3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220.  

    It is sufficient to know that Islamic doctrine is the ultimate cause of the massacre.  ISIS propaganda summons Muslims embedded in Dar ul-Harb to slaughter Harbis, and two of them, damnation be upon them, did. It is enough, foreign command, direction and local conspiracy are indifferent except to potential victims who may be next.

But it is clear that the two of them had gone down the dark path of radicalization, embracing a perverted interpretation of Islam that calls for war against America and the West.

CamelShit!!! "Radicalization" is a damnable lie. Terrorism is normative, not exceptional in Islam. Will cast terror, cast terror, made victorious with terror... who can get a clue?  Click through and read the ayat & ahadith linked above. Get a clue and curse Islam. 

    "Perverted interpretation" is a damnable lie.  8.39 commands warfare against pagans until only Allah is worshiped. 9.29 commands warfare against Christians, Jews & Zoroastrians until they are subjugated and submit to extortion.  The sooner the liar goes to Hell, the better.  Read the Qur'an & Sahih Bukhari to see Moe's interpretation of Islam, the only authentic interpretation.

They had stockpiled assault weapons, ammunition, and pipe bombs. So this was an act of terrorism, designed to kill innocent people.

    Acts of terrorism are designed to inflict terror; to create paranoia & confusion so as to make normal life impossible and weaken our will to resist.

Our nation has been at war with terrorists since al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11.

    Who were we at war witth 74 years ago? Was it kamikazes? Was it Panzeers? It was Imperial Japan and Germany, not individual organizations & divisions.  Islam is at war against us and we need to reciprocate.  We need to eradicate Islam from the face of the earth because its damnable doctrines perpetuate war.  

In the process, we’ve hardened our defenses — from airports to financial centers, to other critical infrastructure. Intelligence and law enforcement agencies have disrupted countless plots here and overseas, and worked around the clock to keep us safe. Our military and counterterrorism professionals have relentlessly pursued terrorist networks overseas — disrupting safe havens in several different countries, killing Osama bin Laden, and decimating al Qaeda’s leadership.

    Too little, too late.  Reagan should have let Israel finish off Arafat instead, he sent Marines to Beirut to be massacred. Slick Willy should have nuked Iran & Saudi Arabia immediately after WTC1.  Shrub should have nuked Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan & Saudi Arabia immediately after WTC2.

Over the last few years, however, the terrorist threat has evolved into a new phase. As we’ve become better at preventing complex, multifaceted attacks like 9/11, terrorists turned to less complicated acts of violence like the mass shootings that are all too common in our society. It is this type of attack that we saw at Fort Hood in 2009; in Chattanooga earlier this year; and now in San Bernardino. And as groups like ISIL grew stronger amidst the chaos of war in Iraq and then Syria, and as the Internet erases the distance between countries, we see growing efforts by terrorists to poison the minds of people like the Boston Marathon bombers and the San Bernardino killers.

They are simply reminding Muslims of the forgotten obligation: offensive Jihad.

For seven years, I’ve confronted this evolving threat each morning in my intelligence briefing. 

According to the reports I get, you skip the PDB.  The threat is "convert or die" but, being born Muslim, the threat is not against you, its against us.

And since the day I took this office, I’ve authorized U.S. forces to take out terrorists abroad precisely because I know how real the danger is.

The danger is in Ummah al-Islamiyya, Muslims jointly & severally. Killing a few leaders does not cut the mustard. Islam must become extinct.

As Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than the security of the American people.

And you abandoned that responsibility, forsworn in your oath of office.  You are one of the enemy, not one of us.

As a father to two young daughters who are the most precious part of my life, I know that we see ourselves with friends and coworkers at a holiday party like the one in San Bernardino. I know we see our kids in the faces of the young people killed in Paris. And I know that after so much war, many Americans are asking whether we are confronted by a cancer that has no immediate cure.

Islam is the cancer, radiation is the answer.  The war continues until Islam is extinct.  Muslims are threatened with Hellfire if they lag behind and promised eternal orgy if they go to Jihad.  Its what Believers do.  Make them quit believing or quit living, one or the other. There is no other solution.

Well, here’s what I want you to know: The threat from terrorism is real, but we will overcome it. We will destroy ISIL and any other organization that tries to harm us.

Its Islam, Stupid! ISIL, HAMAS, Hezbollah, etc.  are subsets of Islam.  They all read the Qur'an, obey Allah & emulate Moe. While they believe in Allah, his imperative, threat & promise, there will be no peace. 

You can not destroy ISIL, even if you could, that would not bring peace because other Believers would continue the Jihad.

Our success won’t depend on tough talk, or abandoning our values, or giving into fear. 

Success will come, if it ever does, certainly not with any damn Democrat in power, by destroying their faith: causing them to cease believing in Allah and causing them to be ashamed of ever having believed. 

Appeasement is not one of our values, neither is submission nor surrender.  Old Harry was true to our values when he nuked Japan: saving American lives by killing the enemy.

That’s what groups like ISIL are hoping for.

No, they are hoping we will lose our will to resist and surrender to them.

Instead, we will prevail by being strong and smart, resilient and relentless, and by drawing upon every aspect of American power.

We can not pevail with suicidal rules of engagement that value enemy lives and assets over ours.  We can not prevail by bombing empty buildings. We can not prevail by lying about the identity of the enemy.  We can not prevail by abandoning hard won ground. We can not prevail by allowing sanctuary to the enemy. We can not prevail by ignoring Iran's supplying the enemy at the front with EFPs.

Here’s how. First, our military will continue to hunt down terrorist plotters in any country where it is necessary. In Iraq and Syria, airstrikes are taking out ISIL leaders, heavy weapons, oil tankers, infrastructure. And since the attacks in Paris, our closest allies — including France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — have ramped up their contributions to our military campaign, which will help us accelerate our effort to destroy ISIL.

There is no effort to destroy ISIL because ISIL is Islam and Islam is ISIL and you are one of them, not one of us.  If you wanted to destroy ISIL, thousands of bombing runs would not have ended with full armament.  If you wanted to destroy ISIL, that armored column approaching Mosul would have been strafed by A10s and destroyed.   

Second, we will continue to provide training and equipment to tens of thousands of Iraqi and Syrian forces fighting ISIL on the ground so that we take away their safe havens.

Your training and equipment provided to Muslims will, sooner or later, be turned on us and our interests int he region.  Shi'ia & Sunni are rivals for power, both are  inimical to us, neither is a friend or allie.  Anyone who reads the Qur'an will know that.

In both countries, we’re deploying Special Operations Forces who can accelerate that offensive. We’ve stepped up this effort since the attacks in Paris, and we’ll continue to invest more in approaches that are working on the ground.

Third, we’re working with friends and allies to stop ISIL’s operations — to disrupt plots, cut off their financing, and prevent them from recruiting more fighters. Since the attacks in Paris, we’ve surged intelligence-sharing with our European allies. We’re working with Turkey to seal its border with Syria. And we are cooperating with Muslim-majority countries — and with our Muslim communities here at home — to counter the vicious ideology that ISIL promotes online.

The vicious ideology is Islam. Only Allah has the right to be worshiped, legislate and rule. All non-Muslims are waging war against Allah and must be converted,  subjugated or killed.  Its Islam, Stupid!!!  We who read the Qur'an & hadith know you to be an accursaed liar.

Fourth, with American leadership, the international community has begun to establish a process — and timeline — to pursue ceasefires and a political resolution to the Syrian war.

There is no ceasefire but hudna, for a maximum of ten years in Islam. There is no political resolution, only conquest or defeat. Any replacement for Assad will be worse.  You and Shrub caused this situation with your damned fool "democracy project" & "Arab Spring".

Doing so will allow the Syrian people and every country, including our allies, but also countries like Russia, to focus on the common goal of destroying ISIL — a group that threatens us all.

Other Muslims do not want to destroy ISIL, they want to use it against rivals for power, keeping it out of their own cities.

This is our strategy to destroy ISIL. It is designed and supported by our military commanders and counterterrorism experts, together with 65 countries that have joined an American-led coalition. And we constantly examine our strategy to determine when additional steps are needed to get the job done. 

The job will not be done until Islam is extinct. When that happy day comes, there will be no more ISIL.  

That’s why I’ve ordered the Departments of State and Homeland Security to review the visa program under which the female terrorist in San Bernardino originally came to this country.

Visas do not cut the mustard. Expel and exclude all Muslims. Let no Muslim cross our border except on the way out.  Its Islam, Stupid!

And that’s why I will urge high-tech and law enforcement leaders to make it harder for terrorists to use technology to escape from justice.

Now, here at home, we have to work together to address the challenge. There are several steps that Congress should take right away.

To begin with, Congress should act to make sure no one on a no-fly list is able to buy a gun.

You can not stop Muslims from getting guns, knives, machetes, razors, hatchets and hammers. You need to get them out of here. Send them all home!!! 

Those who perpetrated the San Bernardino Massacre were not on the no fly list and two of their weapons were procured in straw buyer deals.  

What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist suspect to buy a semi-automatic weapon? This is a matter of national security.

What could possibly be the argument for allowing a terrorist to live among us and kill our fellows at will?

We also need to make it harder for people to buy powerful assault weapons like the ones that were used in San Bernardino. I know there are some who reject any gun safety measures. But the fact is that our intelligence and law enforcement agencies — no matter how effective they are — cannot identify every would-be mass shooter, whether that individual is motivated by ISIL or some other hateful ideology. What we can do — and must do — is make it harder for them to kill.

You can only, and seek to, make it more difficult for us to defend ourselves. You are exploiting national grief for political gain, shame on you and every AssWhole who voted for you!

Next, we should put in place stronger screening for those who come to America without a visa so that we can take a hard look at whether they’ve traveled to warzones. 

Just screen out the damn Muslims! Keep it simple, Stupid.

And we’re working with members of both parties in Congress to do exactly that.

Finally, if Congress believes, as I do, that we are at war with ISIL, it should go ahead and vote to authorize the continued use of military force against these terrorists. 

Congress should issue a declaration of war on Islam and order you to prosecute that war effectively to the last Musalim.

For over a year, I have ordered our military to take thousands of airstrikes against ISIL targets. I think it’s time for Congress to vote to demonstrate that the American people are united, and committed, to this fight.

Impeaching, convicting and removing you from office is the first step.

My fellow Americans, these are the steps that we can take together to defeat the terrorist threat. Let me now say a word about what we should not do.

We should not be drawn once more into a long and costly ground war in Iraq or Syria. 

We should use our technical advantage against them: bomb them wherever you find them with Daisy Cutters, MOABs and Neutron Bombs.  Every base, every training camp, every occupied city and every military asset up in smoke without regard or regret for collateral damage. 

And quit supplying and training Muslims, they are the enemy.

That’s what groups like ISIL want. They know they can’t defeat us on the battlefield. ISIL fighters were part of the insurgency that we faced in Iraq. But they also know that if we occupy foreign lands, they can maintain insurgencies for years, killing thousands of our troops, draining our resources, and using our presence to draw new recruits.

The strategy that we are using now — airstrikes, Special Forces, and working with local forces who are fighting to regain control of their own country — that is how we’ll achieve a more sustainable victory. And it won’t require us sending a new generation of Americans overseas to fight and die for another decade on foreign soil.

Here’s what else we cannot do. We cannot turn against one another by letting this fight be defined as a war between America and Islam.

Only because you are a Goddamn Muslim. Its Islam, Stupid. We who read the Qur'an, hadith and Islamic law will not be deceived by your lies any more than we were deceived by  Shrub's. 

In 1778, before the reconquest of Israel, before American boots polluted the soil of the Hijaz, the Barbary Pirates sacked our merchantmen 'cuz it was "written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise."  So Tripoly's Ambassador to England told Jefferson & Adams. Who will get a clue?

That, too, is what groups like ISIL want. ISIL does not speak for Islam. They are thugs and killers, part of a cult of death, and they account for a tiny fraction of more than a billion Muslims around the world — including millions of patriotic Muslim Americans who reject their hateful ideology.

Anyone who rejects the damnable doctrines of Islam, is no Muslim, he is either an infidel, a hypocrite or an apostate.  Muslims are thugs and killers. Islam was founded by a barbarian war lord for his own personal emolument through plunder and extortion. 

Islam is the cult of death:  "We love death more than you love life." 'Cuz being killed in battle gets them out of the fire and into Allah's celestial bordello.

Moreover, the vast majority of terrorist victims around the world are Muslim. 

How many of the 270 Million Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Christians, Yazidis, Animists, pagans & Zoroastrians slaughtered by Muslims since 623 were Muslims?  Shi'ia and Sunni kill each other 'cuz they are rivals for power since before the battle of Karbala.  We are their primary target.

If we’re to succeed in defeating terrorism we must enlist Muslim communities as some of our strongest allies, rather than push them away through suspicion and hate.

Exactly what Goddamn part of this escapes your comprehension: 

3:28. Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliyâ (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allâh in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allâh warns you against Himself (His Punishment), and to Allâh is the final return.


That does not mean denying the fact that an extremist ideology has spread within some Muslim communities.

Kill them wherever you find them, strike terror, terrify and fight those who... until... are not extreme, they are normative in Islam.  Moe spread terror by assassinations, genocide, barbarian rapine and burning crops.  The founder's preaching & example are normal, not extreme.

This is a real problem that Muslims must confront, without excuse. Muslim leaders here and around the globe have to continue working with us to decisively and unequivocally reject the hateful ideology that groups like ISIL and al Qaeda promote; to speak out against not just acts of violence, but also those interpretations of Islam that are incompatible with the values of religious tolerance, mutual respect, and human dignity.

Muslims must reject Islam and apostatize. That which you would have them condemn is  intrinsic  to the core of Islam.  It is enshrined in the Qur'an & exemplified in the Sunnah and can not be abjured short of apostasy.

But just as it is the responsibility of Muslims around the world to root out misguided ideas that lead to radicalization, it is the responsibility of all Americans — of every faith — to reject discrimination.

"Radicalization" is a Goddamn lie!  Its Islam, Stupid!! Believers are defined in 9.111 & 49.15. Click through and get a clue.  

It is the responsibility of all Harbis wheresoever dispersed over the face of the earth, to reject, condemn, curse and campaign for the extinction of Islam.  Expelling and excluding Muslims from Dar ul-Harb is the first step towards regaining security.

It is our responsibility to reject religious tests on who we admit into this country.

It is your responsibility to enact a criminal enterprise test on all who enter America.  Members of the Mafia, whether Italian or Arabic must be excluded. Admit no Muslims because they belong to the war cult, originally an Arab Mafia.

It’s our responsibility to reject proposals that Muslim Americans should somehow be treated differently.

There are no Muslim Americans. Islam and Americanism are mutually exclusive.  Muslims in America are an enemy fifth column and must be expelled.

Because when we travel down that road, we lose.

We lose when you lie about the identity of the enemy: its Islam, Traitor!

That kind of divisiveness, that betrayal of our values plays into the hands of groups like ISIL.

Tolerating Islam and lying about it is the betrayal of our values: the divine origin of the rights to life, liberty, free expression, self government and property ownership.

Muslim Americans are our friends and our neighbors, our co-workers, our sports heroes — and, yes, they are our men and women in uniform who are willing to die in defense of our country. We have to remember that.

Muslims, all Muslims are enemies sworn to the destruction of our way of life.  This is true no matter where they are dispersed over the face of the earth.  They are obligated by enslavement to Allah, to fight us until we submit.

My fellow Americans, I am confident we will succeed in this mission because we are on the right side of history. We were founded upon a belief in human dignity — that no matter who you are, or where you come from, or what you look like, or what religion you practice, you are equal in the eyes of God and equal in the eyes of the law.

Those who hold themselves superior because of their enslavement to Satan; who deny the sanctity of our blood & property and our human rights are not equal, they are 'more equal'. To Hell with them.  The practice of Islam is inimical to our lives and liberties.  Get a clue!

Even in this political season, even as we properly debate what steps I and future Presidents must take to keep our country safe, let’s make sure we never forget what makes us exceptional.

Our organic documents are the national treasures that make America exceptional.  Your AssWholliness: the abomination of desolation standing in the temple of liberty, is destroying this nation.

Let’s not forget that freedom is more powerful than fear;
that we have always met challenges — whether war or depression, natural disasters or terrorist attacks — by coming together around our common ideals as one nation, as one people.

American patriots and Muslims are enemies, not one people. They are here to conquer, not to assimilate.

 So long as we stay true to that tradition, I have no doubt America will prevail.

Thank you. God bless you, and may God bless the United States of America.