Wednesday, June 21, 2017

Only left to imagine, from whence in this world came these perverted translations of the Qur’an?


(Originally posted at dlbrand June 21, 2017 OpposingIslam)

By Debi Brand

Yesterday over at Jihad Watch, among the articles posted and featured by Robert Spencer was one titled, Philippines:Islamic State leaders torch the Christian school they graduated from”

Details in that article include the telling of how, “Twenty years after obtaining Christian education, Muslim brothers Omarkhayam and Abdullah Maute returned to this Central Mindanao city with the black flags of the Islamic State (IS) group and set fire to their alma mater.”

The details tell of how, the Maute brothers, accompanied by “Hundreds of gunmen, many of them young locals recruited …destroyed Dansalan College in a rampage through Marawi City.”

They include, “Zia Alonto Adiong, a member of the legislative assembly of the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, stating, “We do not understand where that hate is coming from.” 

The details also provide, how, “Duma Sani, a former dean of Mindanao State University” stated that “most locals did not support their radical Islamic brand that mandated the killing of nonbelievers.”

With the former dean of Mindanao State University further stating, “These [Marawi gunmen] are young people who have their own interpretation of the Quran….”

Such a darn shame, is it not? And to think of it, it is, seemingly, all because of those awful “extremist.”

Those awful “extremist,” I can well imagine, just how they broke into Islamic publishing houses the world over, probably, in the middle of the night, and there taking their Moderate victims captive, binding and gagging them.

Then, with the Moderates thus contained, the extremist went about changing all the “sacred texts.”

Therein making a liar and laughing stock of “Allah” and his claim to protect the Qur’an from manipulation and perversion.

I can thus well imagine, once the said Moderates were freed, the “extremist” vanished, then, worn and walloped, tattered and torn, weary and wondering, the Moderates, all the same, had to get to work. Business was, after all, at the door.

And so they sold those books just as the “extremist” had left them.

Did so at Kitab Bhavan ,New Delhi ; Iman Publishing House, Bloomington, IN; Darussalam, Global Leader in Islamic Books, Riyadh, Jeddah, Al-Khobar, Sharjah, Lahore, London, Houston, New York; Maktaba-e-Darul- ‘Uloom, Karachi; Medinah Press, Cape Town, South Africa; The Islamic Texts Society, UK.

Did so at amana publications, Beltsville, Maryland, U.S.A.;  Islamic Book Service, USA, Hicksville, N.Y;  Ta Ha Publishers LTD, London, UK; Dar Al Taqwa Ltd. London; Royal Aal-Bayt Institution for Islamic Thought, Amman, Jordan; SUNY Press, New York, University of California, Los Angeles, The University of Chicago.

Did so at Routledge Studies in Classical Islam, New York, NY;  did so at Oxford University Press, Karachi, Pakistan; did so at Garnet Publishing, The Center for Muslim Contribution to Civilization, UK; did so at First Gorgias Press ,Columbia University.

Did likewise at Adam Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi, India; so too at 5 Pillars Publication, London, and I’ve little doubt, only God knows where all else the message of Islam, on the books, was perverted.


Hence, the message today, sadly, now known the world over as Islam–perverted, perverted, perverted.

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Exposing Islam With Billboards

Exposing Islam With Billboards Exposing Islam With Billboards

    A well designed billboard in a high traffic location can attract a great deal of attention. This one in Indianapolis  made Muslim heads explode without explicitly naming its subject.

Muslims & Dhimmis, aware of the charges against the false prophet, over reacted, multiplying the effect of the billboard.

    The beauty of that billboard is its veracity. I documented it here. Imam Bukhari is said to have winnowed down 300,000 hadith to 7275, of which 2,230 are unique. His hadith collection is said to be second only to the Qur'an in authenticity.  All of his ahadith are supposed to be authentic. How can Muslims disclaim them?  Without  hadith, they do not know what to do in emulating the Profit.

    Besides verifying the truth about Moe, Bukhari's hadith can be used to expose Islam. The current  billboard should be reproduced in other cities where courage and financing can be found.  The following samples, while not copy ready, illustrate how smoking gun hadith can be used to expose the world's worst evil.

    If you have the $ and the courage, get these up all over the country. In the mean time, share them with social media posts. And when Muslims & Dhimmis kvetch, direct them to this post for the fatal facts.  [Bold blue underlined text is hyperlinked to authentic Islamic source texts.]

Plunder!



Open Sahih Bukhari Vol. 4 to page 108 and verify this saying. I edited the second footnote, which referenced the glossary1.  My citation is to the ayat which establishes Jizya as one terminal condition of a fight Jews & Christians Until... loop.  Moe got his income by plunder! Read the Book of Khumus in vol. 4!

Jizya


Terror!

    Terror is the condition they wish to impose, both ends and means, but not the real issue. The real issue is Jihad. But Terror gets public attention, so let us exploit it to the hilt.

 


    This one might be more effective with the reference to the Profit deleted. That would force the Muslims to expose themselves by objecting to it. 

    This pithy saying is found on page 140 of volume 4 of Sahih Bukhari. 

    Who will argue with the  Profit and the great muhadithin who authenticated his saying? That is hadith #2977 on page 140, linked above.

Object of fear

    Using this one will require a spokesman well versed in Islamic texts.  Supporting it will not be easy, but it is vital.

    This proof of concept sample is not made from the actual text 'cuz the original is damn near illegible. It is poorly printed in an archaic font and poorly scanned from a drenched copy. There is excessive bleed through on the lower half of the page.

    The source is the second volume of Hedaya, the fiqh of the Hanafi madhab, used in colonial India and the Ottoman Empire. Page 154 contains a discussion of the granting of protection, by Muslims, to infidels passing through.   The grant of protection is only valid if issued by a  Muslim who is able to attack the infidel, and is therefore an object of terror to him. 
If a free person grant protection to an infidel, or to a body of infidels, or to the people of a fort or city, the protection is valid, whether the person granting it be a man or a woman; and no person of the Muslims is afterwards at liberty to molest them; because the prophet has said "If the least among the Muslims grant protection to an infidel, and make a compact with him, it behooves the whole to observe such protection and compact, and not to break it;" and the learned agree that the word  [illegible]  [the least,] in this saying means a single person---and also, because any single Muslim is empowered to make war upon the infidels, wherefore they fear him, since he is competent to oppose them; by his granting protection, therefore, protection is established from him, since he is one of whom protection may be asked, because the object of fear is the object from which to look for protection; and a single Muslim is the object of fear, (according to  according to what we have before asserted, that the infidels fear him")"

In the excerpt above, I have cleaned up one anachronism: substituting Muslim for Mussleman. I added bold font emphasis to the crucial clauses.
 #Billboard
#plunder
#Jizya
#Terror
#ObjectOfFear


Sunday, June 11, 2017

Unforgivable Negligence


(Originally posted at OpposingIslam)

By Debi Brand



And I am reminded, as ibn Kathir provides in his tafsir, “Allah states that there are disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers among the bedouins.” (Surah At-Tawbah 9: 97-99)

The bedouins spoken to above were those among the first group of followers of the alleged “Prophet of Islam,” the Muslims of his day.

If then, in the time of the alleged presence on this earth of the alleged “Prophet,” in his following were “disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers,” what fool among us now fails to regard today also in every group of Muslims are “disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers”?

And regarding that fact, what coward among us, what fool among us, what Leader, will send, or lead men into war wherein they are expected to count as allies those from Muhammad’s Ummah and do so failing to provide for the above-stated reality: among the Muslims are “disbelievers, hypocrites, and believers”?

Moreover, regard or refuse to do so, the believers among that group will be those who live by that written in “The Book of Allah,” they will be those who live by all in the Sunnah of “Allah’s Messenger,” lock, stock, and barrel of it.

Therefore, unless willing to accept your place among the derelict, you had better know, and know well, what orders and guidance are in those works, because they will be the orders the believer will follow, all others they will reject.

They will follow “Allah’s” orders, they will follow the same of “Allah’s Messenger.” Thus, unless you and your orders, goals, and commands fall in line with the above “Allah” orders, the believer will reject your orders, and execute “Allah’s” orders.

The disbelievers referred to above are those who openly reveal they disbelieve the lot of Muhammad’s message. The Hypocrites among the Muslims, they are those who conceal the disbelief in Islam they hold in their hearts, thus, outwardly, to save their skins, they pretend to be believers. 

They are the ones we claim are “Moderate Muslims.”

The Qur’an states concerning these hypocrites, “They hide within themselves what they dare not reveal to you.” (Surah Al “Imran: 154) They dare not reveal their disbelief to the believers, as touched on above, aiming to stay alive.

What’s more, at times the believers in “Allah’s Book,” they too, to the unbeliever, “hide within themselves what they dare not reveal to you.” Until the moment is right, opportunity ripe for the taking,  that is, then the mask they hurl aside.

Sahih of Al-Bukhari speaks to that concept this way: “Abu Ad-Darda said, “We give a smile for some people while our hearts curse them.” (Bukhari, Book of Al-Adab [Good Manners].)

Why in this world would such a hadith state that, what in this world could it possibly mean?

Expounding on, “Let not the believers take the disbelievers as friends instead of the believers….” Ibn Kathir, in his tafsir, answers that for us:


Allah prohibited His believing servants from becoming supporters of the disbelievers, or to take them as comrades with whom they develop friendship, rather than the believers ….except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al Bakhari said, that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.”


Footnotes thereat provide on the “Taqyah”: “To shield what is in one’s heart.” (Tafsir, ibn Kathir, Surah 3. Al ‘Imran:28, Vol. 3. P.142.)

For such reason, if you are taking as our “allies” those who hold as sacred in their hearts that in “Allah’s Book” and you are commanding those entrusted to your leadership to trust in the alleged trustworthiness of your alleged “ally,” you had better know—and make known you know it—you know and regard what is in “Allah’s Book.”

In other words, just state it, Mr. President, and have your Generals do likewise, this is a Russian Roulette game you are willing to play, for the chance of mission-success—mission: our rule, our ways, our traditions, overruling the inveterate rules, ways, traditions of Muhammad in the hearts and minds of “those who believe."

Just make it clear, right up front, in pursuit of the above mission, this is a sting to our core that you are willing to chance absorbing the pain thereof, and absorb that pain not just once, not just twice, not just thrice, but if need be endlessly.

State clear, Sir, unlike “Muhammad’s” rule thus his sunnah, “A believer is not stung twice (by something) out of one and the same hole,” we will be. (al-Bukhari, Book of Al-Adab [Good Manners]).

Footnote provided on the just cited sahih, reads, “A believer should be on the alert and benefit by his experience to avoid faults in future and is not deceived twice.” (Ibid.)

Under the heading, “The Believer Does Not Provide Opportunity to be Stung Twice From One (And the Same) Hole,” Sahih Muslim speaks to the above-cited sunnah-contrast to our practiced idiocy. (V. 4. Book Pertaining to Piety and Softening of Hearts.)

Ibn Sa’d, and others do also, Sa’d providing, “The Apostle of Allah, may Allah bless him, said: Verily, a believer is not stung twice from the same hole. You will not return to Makkah to declare, rubbing your cheeks, that you had befooled Muhammad twice.” (Kitab Al-Tabaqat Al-Kabir, Vol. II, P. 51.)

But we will oblige the believer with such bragging rights. Do so again and again, and again, as history records concerning such.

Therefore, Mr. President, just make it clear to the troops beneath your command, in this mission, part of their mission is to pretend a believer is something other than what “the Book of Allah” declares a believer is.

State fact clear, Sir: you are asking our soldiers to take as allies those who hold in their hearts regard for the “Book of Allah,” thus regard for the orders and examples of the “Sunnah of Allah’s Messenger.”

And given this “ally” of ours holds such in his heart, at some point, if half a chance avails itself, that “ally” is certain to reveal that which he holds in his heart. Act in accordance with that. And at that moment, whatever you, your “war-plans,” and your policies have provided to that believer as easy prey will be harvested as just that.

Once again, homes, hearts, and lives will absorb the pain of the stupidity and cowardice in our leaders in face of Islam. Because far too many of our leaders are by choice ignorant on the doctrines of Islam, thus to cowardly to candidly address what is written therein. So once again, at the hands of one of our “allies,” a believer, who, we like fools, claimed as one of our allies, three more U.S. Soldiers fell.

What purpose did the death of these men serve?

Here follows that answer:


It is more humiliating for the disbelievers and more comforting to the hearts of the faithful that the believers kill the disbelievers by their own hands. Allah said to the believers of this Ummah,

“Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands, and disgrace them, and give you victory over them, and heal the breast of a believing people [9:14].” ( Ibn Kathir, Tafsir, Ibid, (Vol.4), PP. 268 - 269.)


Tafsir Ma ‘ariful Qur’an rendition of that verse and a couple others included here with it reads this way: [“Allah” commanded] “And give those who disbelieve the ‘good’ news of a painful punishment.” (Surah Al-Taubah: 9: 3) “Kill the Mushriks wherever you find them.” ( 9: 5.)

It follows that with, “Fight them, so that Allah should punish them at your hands and disgrace them, and help you win against them and bring relief to bosoms of a believing people, [14] and remove the rage of their hearts…. [15.]” (Surah Al-Taubah : 9, as stated, Ma’ariful Qur’an Vol 4 rendered.)

In concluding this, Mr. President, once more, you Sir -- as were to no-avail asked your predecessors -- are asked, begged, to find within yourself the courage and discipline to acquaint yourself with that in “Allah’s Book.”

Sir, once again, you are asked and begged, to regard the facts of what comprises the doctrines of Islam. Demand the same of your Generals and Commanders. Do so, before you ask our men and women in uniform to take as allies those who believe in that book.

Choosing to follow in the footsteps and practice of your immediate predecessors in this conflict, with respect to the above, and thus, electing to neglect the above voiced request and plea for you to attend to the duty stated and called for, will be for you just as it was for them: except for the Cross, unforgivable negligence.

(As originally posted at: Unforgivable Negligence, at OpposingIslam)


Wednesday, June 07, 2017

Muslims and Dhimmis Are Truthophobes! The Billboard And ThisBlogpost Will Educate Them!

Muslims and Dhimmis Are Truthophobes! The Billboard And This Blogpost Will Educate Them! Thanks and a tip of the hat to Bare Naked Islam!
If you have the money and courage to put up a billboard, here are some content suggestions.

Educate Truthophobes


    Muslims & Dhimmis are bitterly bitching about a billboard which they imply is dissing Moe. Examine it carefully: Is he mentioned by name on the billboard?  Is Islam mentioned?  How do those critics connect the billboard to their Profit???

    Islam, being a false and malicious contrivance, is extremely fragile. It can not withstand questioning or criticism. In one biography of the Profit, there is an extensive discussion of the legal necessity of killing anyone who disses Moe. The discussion includes a long list of murders ordered or approved by the Profit.
https://archive.org/stream/AshShifaArabicEnglishScanned/Ash-shifa-Arabic-English%20Scanned#page/n731/mode/2up
You can learn more in that book, including the fact that his excrement did not stink and drinking his urine would prevent gutache. Drinking his blood prevented one man from going to Hell.

    In this post you will find quotes from Wikiislam and links to original sources including "Sahih Bukhari" and "The Life Of Muhammad".  Read'em and weep, Muslims!



The perfect man

    Who is "the perfect man"? 

al-Insān al-Kāmil

    I quote Wikiislam:
"In Islam, the Prophet Muhammad is known as al-Insān al-Kāmil (the perfect human) and uswa hasana (an excellent model of conduct). "

    Where? The Qur'an!
33:21. Indeed in the Messenger of Allâh (Muhammad ) you have a good example to follow for him who hopes in (the Meeting with) Allâh and the Last Day and remembers Allâh much.

If you wnt to get into Jannah, you't better meet Allah on good terms when Judgment Day rolls around. So who should you emulate and what did he do?


married a six year old

    While Khadija was alive, Moe did not dare to take another wife. After her death, he married Sauda, a widow. Shortly thereafter, he married the six year old daughter of his bosom buddy, Abu Bakr.  Instead of reinventing the wheel, I direct doubters, dissenters & deniers to this blog post which quotes the muttawir ahadith relevant to the marriage to Aisha:
https://www.scribd.com/doc/232668510/Aisha-s-Age-of-Marriage

Imran Firasat created a graphic novel based on the story, watch it here: http://islamexposed.blogspot.com/2014/07/aisha-and-muhammad-dramatic-life-of.html

child molester

    No, it ain't on the billboard, would not fit. Moe did not consummate the marriage until Aisha was nine years old. In the interim, he was practicing
Mufakhathat. He was thighing the little girl! Read about it here, including a link to a fatwa permitting thighing 'cuz it is sunnah!

beheaded 600 Jews in one day

    The number is inexact 'cuz the records only give us a range.  I quote Wikiislam:
“The Jews were made to come down, and Allah’s Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men.”
Ishaq 464
The quote is from Guillaume's translation  which you can read here. The story is told in Sahih Bukhari.

slave owner and dealer

    A slave owner had declared his will that his slave be emancipated on his death. Moe seized the slave and sold him.  read about it in Sahih Bukhari .  Moe owned a black slave, read about it in vol. 8.

Polygamy

The Profit had nine wives and used to "visit them all in one night" meaning he had sex with all of them. Read about it in vol. 7.  Read more about his wives here.

rapist

    Sad but true. He took sex slaves from among the captives. Safiya was one of them.

tortured & killed unbelievers

    Safiya, whose rape was mentioned above, was the bride of Kinanna, chief of the Jewish settlement at Khaibar Oasis. Moe had him tortured to discover the location of their gold. When Kinanna remained silent, Moe had him killed. Read about it in The Life Of Muhammad.  Wikiislam quotes it: 
Kinana b. al-Rabi', who had the custody of the treasure of the B. al-Nadir, was brought to the apostle who asked him about it. He denied that he knew where it was. A Jew came (Tabari says "was brought") to the apostle and said that he had seen Kinana going round a certain ruin every morning early. When the apostle said to Kinana, 'Do you know that if we find you have it I shall kill you?' he said Yes. The apostle gave orders that the ruin was to be excavated and some of the treasure was found. When he asked him about the rest he refused to produce it, so the apostle gave ordrs to al-Zubayr b. al-'Awwam, 'Torture him until you extract what he has,' so he kindled a fire with flint and steel on his chest until he was nearly dead. Then the apostle delivered him to Muhammad b. Maslama and he struck off his head in revenge for his brother Mahmud.
The story is on page 515.

    In Islamic law, slander is "anything the hearer might not like", the hearer being the subject.  Moe is dead; he can't hear what is on that billboard and can not see it. In Islamic law, truth is not a defense against accusations of slander. But we are not under Islamic law. Not yet.


Monday, June 05, 2017

May Crapped On British Terror Victims, Past, Present and Futuret

May Crapped On British Terror Victims, Past, Present and Futuret    

Update: Paul Weston nailed it!

Listen and heed his wisdom! British Prime Minister Theresa May stood before 10 Downing St. and shit upon the citizens of Britain including the innocent vectims of Islam and the rest of the world.  I found a transcript of her spew at the Independent and intend to dissect it, marking the most egregious turds with superscripts internally linked to my incendiary commentary which follows below the horizontal line.


We cannot and must not pretend that things can continue as they are1. Things need to change2 and they need to change in four important ways.
  • First, while the recent attacks are not connected by common networks3, they are connected in one important sense. They are bound together by the single evil ideology of Islamist extremism4 that preaches hatred, sows division and promotes sectarianism.
  • It is an ideology that claims our Western values of freedom, democracy and human rights are incompatible with the religion of Islam5. It is an ideology that is a perversion of Islam6 and a perversion of the truth7.
  • Defeating this ideology is one of the great challenges of our time, but it cannot be defeated by military intervention alone8.
  • It will not be defeated by the maintenance of a permanent defensive counter-terrorism operation, however skillful its leaders and practitioners.
  • It will only be defeated when we turn people's minds away from this violence and make them understand that our values - pluralistic British values - are superior to anything offered by the preachers and supporters of hate9.
    • Second, we cannot allow this ideology the safe space it needs to breed.
    • Yet that is precisely what the internet, and the big companies that provide internet-based services provide10.
    • We need to work with allied democratic governments to reach international agreements that regulate cyberspace to prevent the spread of extremist and terrorism planning.
    • And we need to do everything we can at home to reduce the risks of extremism online11.
      • Third, while we need to deprive the extremists of their safe spaces online, we must not forget about the safe spaces that continue to exist in the real world12.
      • Yes, that means taking military action to destroy Isis13 in Iraq and Syria. But it also means taking action here at home.
      • While we have made significant progress in recent years, there is - to be frank - far too much tolerance of extremism14 in our country.
      • So we need to become far more robust in identifying it and stamping it out across the public sector and across society.
      • That will require some difficult, and often embarrassing, conversations.
      • But the whole of our country needs to come together to take on this extremism, and we need to live our lives not in a series of separated, segregated communities, but as one truly United Kingdom15.
        • Fourth, we have a robust counter-terrorism strategy16, that has proved successful over many years.
        • But as the nature of the threat we face becomes more complex, more fragmented, more hidden, especially online, the strategy needs to keep up.
        • So in light of what we are learning about the changing threat, we need to review Britain's counter-terrorism strategy to make sure the police17 and security services have all the powers they need.
        • And if we need to increase the length of custodial sentences18 for terrorist-related offences - even apparently less serious offences - that is what we will do.
        • Since the emergence of the threat from Islamist-inspired terrorism, our country has made significant progress in disrupting plots and protecting the public.  But it is time to say 'Enough is enough19'.

        • Everybody needs to go about their lives as they normally would. Our society should continue to function in accordance with our values.
        • But when it comes to taking on extremism and terrorism, things need to change.
        • As a mark of respect20, two political parties have suspended our national campaigns for today. But violence can never be allowed to disrupt the democratic process, so those campaigns will resume in full tomorrow and the General Election will go ahead as planned on Thursday.
        • As a country, our response must be as it has always been when we have been confronted by violence.
        • We must come together, we must pull together, and united we will take on and defeat our enemies."



Continue

    Repeating the same damn fool mistakes and expecting different results is the hallmark of insanity.  You can not continue to pretend that Islam is a benign, anodyne religion and Muslims are peaceful people who share our attitudes, needs and wants. You can not continue to pretend that coexistence is possible.

change

    Change and improvement are not synonymous terms. Decline and death are not improvements. First and formost, identify the enemy: Muslims and the doctrine that makes them inimical: Islam. Second, abandon the crime/punishment paradigm and recognize Muslim attacks as acts of war requiring preemptive and retaliatory attacks.

attacts connected

    Every accursed attacker was a Muslim: Believing slave of Satan. Whether acting as a lone wolf or in packs, a 'slime's a 'slime for alla' that. Only Muslims engage in Islamic Jihad. Where there are no Muslims there will be no Jihad.

extremism

    The founder of Islam, God burn him, set the standard. What he said and did is normative Islam, not extreme. Perpetual war, genocide & terrorism are normative Islam, not extreme, radical, perverted, distorted or hijacked. Terrorism is Islamic worship!!! incompatibleincompatiblein

incompatible

    `Islam is incompatible with the values of Western Civilization!  Only Allah has the right to be worshiped.  That means you have no right to p;ractice Christianity. Any negative statement about Islam carries the death penalty. If you doubt that, go to Amazon, buy Reliance Of The Traveller and read book o, chapter 8 through 8.7.  There is no free speech.  Only Muslims have human rights.

perversion

    Terrorism is an intrinsic sacrament of Islam, off the shelf, normative Islam as preached and practiced by its accursed founder.
3:151, 8:12,39,57,60,65,67, 9:5,29,38, 39,111,120,123, 33:26,27, 47:4,49:15, 59:2,13, 61:10-13*; Sahih Bukhari 1.7.331 & 4.52.220

truth

    Islam is false; malignant malarkey; there is no truth in it! Allah is not God and God is not Allah! The Koran is situational scripture! Moe's favorite child bride finked on him! Islam is mercenary! Moe contrived it for his personal emolument!

Defeating Ideology

    Muslims are the enemy. Muslims must be defeated. Muslims can only be defeated by exterminating them. The ideology:
    Because Muslims go to war and to Jannah or sit home and to Jannahm, they will never cease waging war until they are exterminated. Some combination of induced apostasy and kinetic action is required.  A dead Muslim is a good Muslim. An ex-Muslim is the best!

    While one Muslim lives, he will breed or recruit more until there are enough to resume the Jihad. There is no other possibility.

    Arab culture is honor/shame based. It is necessary to make Muslims ashamed of their affinity to Allah & Moe. It is necessary to show the Ummah  exactly how Moe defrauded them by inverting good and evil. Show them his mercenary motivation. Show them his treachery. Show them his rapes and murders. Show them what he prayed to and what he prayed for. Show them how the verses were 'revealed'.

our values

    Muslims do not share our values! To them, this world is but play and pass time. The real action is in Jannah: Allah's celestial orgy whose base description is found in Surah An-Naba' beginning at verse 31.  Details are scattered throughout the Koran. Search it for 'purified mates' and 'gardens'.

    There are  three ways to gain admission to Jannah: be perfect and sinless, depend on Allah's fickle mercy or the guaranteed tickets of Jihad and martyrdom.  Martyrdom gets the Mujahid more and better food & wine and more Jewish & Christian women taken from the fire for his sexual pleasure.

    To Muslims, Allah's law is the only valid law, derived from the Koran & hadith.  Laws made by men through deliberative process and compromise are rebellion against Allah.

    You can not convince believing Muslims that democracy is better than theocracy! You can not convince them that tolerance is better than killing or enslaving every infidel.

safe space

internet

    The internet is a means of communication. I am using it to inform readers about Islam: its evil mission & methods and how to defeat it.  Millions of Muslims have social media and message board accounts. Many of them have multiple accounts and they read and write in strange languages. They use codes, steganography and encrytpion.  No law or regulation can stop them from communicating and plotting. There are simply too many messsages to intercept, decrypt, translate, analyze and decode.

extremism

    It's Islam, Stupid! The belief that only Allah has the right to be worshiped. infidels must be converted, killed or enslaved,  and extorted can not be tolerated!!!  The belief that genocide and terrorism will be rewarded withBrownie Points and admission to a celestial orgy can not be tolerated!!!

Sanctuary

    There must be no safe space for Muslims. Expel them from Britain and all of  Dar al-Harb. Kick them out and keep them out! Do not let any Muslim cross our borders to occupy our territory.

    The Koran commands "kill them wherever you find them"  We should follow that dictum. Shrub should have nuked Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan immediately after the accursed abomination!

    Every terrorist training camp, barracks, staging area, bunker and convoy should be destroyed. Their funeral processions should be strafed. No place and no occasion should be safe for those with a divine mandate to conquer us!

military action

destroy ISIS

    ISIS, Boko Haram, Al-Qaeda  etc. et. al. are not the enemy, they are divisions of the enemy. There are more than 45 named terror groups. Muslims are the enemy!!  Bomb them off the face of the earth!!!!  There is no substitute for victory and victory against Islam consists only in its extinction.The conflict is existential.Us or them: your choice.

    Shrub should have nuked Afghanistan and the other nations that facilitated and financed the accursed abomination.

One united kingdom

    With zero Muslims! Where there are Muslims, there is Jihad and terror.

robust strategy

    After the bombing of the buss and subway lines, the numerous stabbings and decapitations and recent bombings and vehicular assaults, only Moron or a damnable AssWhole would claim success for a miserably failed strategy!!!

    The crime:punishment model must be abandoned and replaced by a war:preemption:retaliation model. The ShitHeads & Traitors running Britain must be replaced by intelligent patriots June 8 '17.

police

    Arm them! They must carry loaded firearms and be authorized to use deadly force. They must be trained in marksmanship and combat shooting. Until they are, they should be complemented by experienced military personnel.

    The intelligence aparatus should be authoried to use the real world equivalent of Agent 007 to exterminate known terror threats and the rest of the Muslims in Britain must be sent home.

Sentences

    Terrorists must be executed, not imprisoned! Imprisoned terrorists invite hostage taking for exchange. They also invite escape attempts. Send them to Hell where they belong. Drown them in hog farm holding tanks or feed them to the hogs. Once is enough!

Enough is enough

    One Goddamn attack is a million too many!!! There was a surplus in '05. Never again!!! Expell all Muslims immediately and do not admit any more!

cowardice not respect!

    The election is June 8, '17, three days off. The campaign should be hot and heavy. Traitors including the P.M. must be called out and culled. Corbyn must be rejected, told to go to Hell. UKIP deserves high praise for continuing their campaign. Their slate deserves the votes of patriotic Britains.

continue,change,attacks connected,extremism,incompatible,perversion,defeating,ideology,our values, safe space, internet,sanctuary,military,destroy,ISIS,united kingdom,police,sentences,enough,respect

Saturday, June 03, 2017

President Erdogan Bitched About Lack Of State Dept. Iftar He Can FOAD!

Terdogan


    No words can express my contempt for the dictator of Turkey.  This gif is a weak statement, totally insufficient to express my ineffable hatred.


    Who is that turd mouth to bitch about freedom of religion while he is an accursed Muslim who closes churches and persecutes Christians?  Jihad Watch has a litany of Turdogan's hypocrisy.  Me confidential has an analysis of the quote.

    The Department of State does not plan to hold an iftar; why in Hell should it?  We have separation of church and state. Our federal government is not allowed to promote Isdamn. If yuou want a damned iftar to celebrate the revelation of Satan's book, host it yourself at your own expense, don't demand that we tax payers subsidize it!!!

freedom of religion


    From Reliance Of The Traveller, Book o: your damned law: [Emphasis added.]

O11.5

Such non-Muslim subjects are obliged to comply with Islamic rules that pertain to the safety and indemnity of life, reputation, and property. In addition, they:

-1- are penalized for committing adultery or theft, thought not for drunkenness;

-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

-3- are not greeted with "as-Salamu 'alaykum";

-4- must keep to the side of the street;

-5- may not build higher than or as high as the Muslims' buildings, though if they acquire a tall house, it is not razed;

-6- are forbidden to openly display wine or pork, (A: to ring church bells or display crosses,) recite the Torah or Evangel aloud, or make public display of their funerals and feastdays;

-7- and are forbidden to build new churches.


Reciprocity

    You first, AssWhole!  For Muslims to celebrate our feasts is haram.  [Emphasis added.]

947: Ruling on celebrating non-Muslim holidays and congratulating them


Can a muslim celebrate a non muslim holiday like Thanksgiving?

Published Date: 1998-03-29

Praise be to Allaah.

Greeting the kuffaar on Christmas and other religious holidays of theirs is haraam, by consensus, as Ibn al-Qayyim, may Allaah have mercy on him, said in Ahkaam Ahl al-Dhimmah: "Congratulating the kuffaar on the rituals that belong only to them is haraam by consensus, as is congratulating them on their festivals and fasts by saying ‘A happy festival to you’ or ‘May you enjoy your festival,’ and so on. If the one who says this has been saved from kufr, it is still forbidden. It is like congratulating someone for prostrating to the cross, or even worse than that. It is as great a sin as congratulating someone for drinking wine, or murdering someone, or having illicit sexual relations, and so on. Many of those who have no respect for their religion fall into this error; they do not realize the offensiveness of their actions. Whoever congratulates a person for his disobedience or bid’ah or kufr exposes himself to the wrath and anger of Allaah."

Congratulating the kuffaar on their religious festivals is haraam to the extent described by Ibn al-Qayyim because it implies that one accepts or approves of their rituals of kufr, even if one would not accept those things for oneself. But the Muslim should not aceept the rituals of kufr or congratulate anyone else for them, because Allaah does not accept any of that at all, as He says (interpretation of the meaning):

"If you disbelieve, then verily, Allaah is not in need of you, He likes not disbelief for His slaves. And if you are grateful (by being believers), He is pleased therewith for you. . ."
[al-Zumar 39:7]

". . . This day, I have perfected your religion for you, completed My favour upon you, and have chosen for you Islaam as your religion . . ."
[al-Maa’idah 5:3]

So congratulating them is forbidden, whether they are one’s colleagues at work or otherwise.

If they greet us on the occasion of their festivals, we should not respond, because these are not our festivals, and because they are not festivals which are acceptable to Allaah. These festivals are innovations in their religions, and even those which may have been prescribed formerly have been abrogated by the religion of Islaam, with which Allaah sent Muhammad (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to the whole of mankind. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):
"Whoever seeks a religion other than Islaam, it will never be accepted of him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers." [Aal ‘Imraan 3:85]

It is haraam for a Muslim to accept invitations on such occasions, because this is worse than congratulating them as it implies taking part in their celebrations.

Similarly, Muslims are forbidden to imitate the kuffaar by having parties on such occasions, or exchanging gifts, or giving out sweets or food, or taking time off work, etc., because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: "Whoever imitates a people is one of them." Shaykh al-Islaam Ibn Taymiyah said in his book Iqtidaa’ al-siraat al-mustaqeem mukhaalifat ashaab al-jaheem: "Imitating them in some of their festivals implies that one is pleased with their false beliefs and practices, and gives them the hope that they may have the opportunity to humiliate and mislead the weak."

Whoever does anything of this sort is a sinner, whether he does it out of politeness or to be friendly, or because he is too shy to refuse, or for whatever other reason, because this is hypocrisy in Islaam, and because it makes the kuffaar feel proud of their religion.

Allaah is the One Whom we ask to make the Muslims feel proud of their religion, to help them adhere steadfastly to it, and to make them victorious over their enemies, for He is the Strong and Omnipotent.

Majmoo’ah Fataawa wa Rasaa’il al-Shaykh Ibn ‘Uthaymeen, 3/369)

Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

   

Thursday, June 01, 2017

Trump's Jerusalem Embassy Act Waiver: AssWholliness!

Trump's Jerusalem Embassy Act Waiver: AssWholliness!     Chump broke his promise to move the embassy to Jerusalem, spewing the same boiler plate camel excrement other Presidents used to excuse their treachery.

Broken promise!


    Chump's pile of camel excrement is reproduced below with superscripts internally linked to my incendiary comments.


While President Donald J. Trump signed the waiver under the Jerusalem Embassy Act and delayed moving the U.S. Embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem1, no one should consider this step to be in any way a retreat from the President's strong support for Israel and for the United States-Israel alliance2.  President Trump made this decision to maximize the chances3 of successfully negotiating a deal between Israel and the Palestinians, fulfilling his solemn obligation to defend America's national security interests4.  But, as he has repeatedly stated his intention to move the embassy, the question is not if that move happens, but only when.



    Hot Air quotes a statement from Israel's Prime Minister[Superscripts added; linked to my comments.]

“Israel’s consistent position is that the American embassy, like the embassies of all countries with whom we have diplomatic relations, should be in Jerusalem, our eternal capital,” the statement from Netanyahu’s office says.

“Maintaining embassies outside the capital drives peace further away by helping keep alive the Palestinian fantasy that the Jewish people and the Jewish state have no connection to Jerusalem.5

Though Israel is disappointed that the embassy will not move at this time, we appreciate today’s expression of President Trump’s friendship to Israel and his commitment to moving the embassy in the future,” 6


WBNZ has AP analysis, including quotes from the enemy forces: [Superscripts added; linked to my comments.]

President Mahmoud Abbas' spokesman, Nabil Abu Rdeneh (nah-BEEL' ah-boo reh-DAY'-nuh), says the decision is an "important positive step" that illustrates the U.S. seriousness about promoting peace.7

The Palestinian ambassador to Washington, Hussam Zomlot, says the move "gives peace a chance."8

Zomlot says: "We are ready to start the consultation process with the U.S. administration. We are serious and genuine about achieving a just and lasting peace."9



Waiver


    The Jerusalem Embassy Act of '95 contains a waiver provision, affording the President an escape clause on grounds of 'national security' as if moving the embassy to Jerusalem would somehow make us less secure.  Camel Shit!  Congress passed feel good legislation; pure optics.  They portrayed themselves as ordering the movement of our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, which was and remains popular, with no intention of actually do ing it. They played politics and Slick Willy winked and went along with it because it made him look good, too.  The act is an accursed sham!

support & alliance

        Questioning Israel's desire for peace, as Chump did in the campaign, is not support. Suggesting that housing construction on Israel's sovereign territory is an 'obstacle to peace4' is not support and suggesting that moving the embassy would be an obstacle to peace is not support.  What ally distates to another its capital city and seat of government?  What ally denies the sovereignty of another over its capital city?

enhance chances

    Enhance chances of ending an existential conflict? In a pig's anus!!! There was, is and can be no such chance since Jews recognized and scorned Moe's attempt to defraud them in the seventh century.

    Jimmy Carter tried and failed. Bill Clinton tried and failed. George Bush tried and failed. Barack Obama  tried and failed.  Is anyone unfamiliar  with  the Charlie Brown cartoon strip in which Lucy snatches the football away from Charlie Brown's foot at the last moment?  Consistently, without fail, she always snatches the ball and he lands with his butt in a puddle and his head on a rock.  But nobody can perceive the analogy. 

    Muslims do not want peace. Muslims want conquest, politicide & genocide; Can you get a clue? I have a few for you. 
(Ta'dhdhana) means `declared', according to Mujahid, or `ordained', according to others. This part of the Ayah indicates a vow, (that He will keep on sending against them) against the Jews, (till the Day of Resurrection, those who would afflict them with a humiliating torment.) on account of their disobedience, defying Allah's orders and Law and using tricks to transgress the prohibitions. It was reported that Musa required the Jews to pay the production tax for seven or thirteen years, and he was the first to do so. Also, the Jews fell under the humiliating rule of the Greek Kushdanin, Chaldeans and later on the Christians, who subjugated and disgraced them, and required them to pay the Jizyah (tribute tax). When Islam came and Muhammad was sent, they became under his power and had to pay the Jizyah, as well. Therefore, the humiliating torment mentioned here includes disgrace and paying the Jizyah, as Al-`Awfi narrated from Ibn `Abbas. In the future, the Jews will support the Dajjal (False Messiah); and the Muslims, along with `Isa, son of Mary, will kill the Jews. This will occur just before the end of this world.
http://www.islam-universe.com/tafsir//7.18998.html

    The paragraph above is a quote from Ibn Kathir's tafsir with the Arabic removed and emphasis added for clarity. 
In Surah Al-araf 7.167, Allah promised to send someone to humiliate and torment the Jews until resurrection day. Who will he send?  Ibn Kathir mentions Greeks, Romans and Muslims.  Can you get a clue? 

    This is a pull your head out of the sand moment! Allah promised to torment and humiliate the Jews until the end of the world!  And in the end, Muslims will exterminate the Jews!!  Who can get a clue?

    Take a close look at Surah Al-Araf 7.167. I put a red frame around the verse for clarity. Click the image to enlarge it for legibility. 
Israel, by recovering part of their patrimony, is living blasphemy: proof of Allah's impotence. Muslims can n

    `Examine Surah Ar-Ra'd 13.41. 
What did Allah promise the Muslims? Can his judgment be reversed? Can land conquered by Muslims be reconquered by Kuffar?  Israel, by recovering part of their patrimony, is living blasphemy: proof of Allah's impotence. Muslims can never tolerate that.


    Wipe the sand from your eyes and read the infamous genocide hadith in which Moe tells his companions that the gates of Jannah will not swing wide for them until they exterminate the Jews. 



Sahih Bukhari All In One page 1603 pdf, vol. 4 pg 113.



Sahih Muslim Vol. 7, pg 316

Read Surah At-Taubah 9.29/ What did Allah command Muslims to do? To who? What are the terminal conditions of that command?

    While the region and the world are Muslim infested, there will be no peace, no matter what Israel and America do or refrain from doing!!!

national security

    What difference does the location of our embassy in Israel make to our national security?! How are we any more secure with the embassy in Tel Aviv?! Where was our embassy when the World Trace Center was attacked twice?  Where was our embassy when the Khobar Towers were bombed? Where was it when two of our embassies in Africa were bombed?  Where was it during the Fort Hood Massacre, Boston Bombing, San Berdino & Orlando massacres?!?  Exactly how could those events have been affected if our embassy had been in Jerusalem?

Chump is a damned fool!

    Allah commanded Muslims to attack Jews, Christians and Zoroastrians before the U.SA. came into being; before we had troops in the Hijaz and before Israel regained independence. The command, contained in Surah At-Taubah 9.29 is codified in Islamic law, which I quote: Reliance Of The Traveller Book O, Chapter 9.8.

o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

"I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,"

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).

    Allah's imperative, as codified in Reliance, is not a function of anything we do, it is a function of our status as Kuffar and nothing else. Not being Muslims is all the provocation they need for attack!

    Hedaya is the code of the Hanafi school of Islamic law; used to govern the Ottoman Empire and colonial India.  It provides that we can be attacked without provocation. Read it and curse Islam!


    A Persian general asked why the Muslims were invading Persia and got this answer:

http://www.muslimaccess.com/sunnah/hadeeth/bukhari/053.html#004.053.386

    In 1778, Thomas Jefferson was one of a commission sent to London to ask why Muslims attacked us. Compare what they told the Persians to what they told Jefferson and get a God blessed clue for Chrissake!

In March 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman (or Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja). When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once.[25]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Barbary_War

    The Embassy Act is a sham. Neither Congress nor any President since Slick Willy intended to enforce it. That includes Chump; I am not deceived.

Palestinian fantasy

    "Palestine"is a damnable lie! It is a corruption of a false name imposed by Rome as an Insult after the Bar Kochba Rebellion.  Sand Maggtots can not pronounce th P. It is Falestine: a false, malignant and malicious narrative. No such entity ever existed. Jerusalem has not been the seat of any nation other than Israel since King David.  The Levant was conquered by caliph Umar in 638.

commitment to moving

    Abandon diplomatic niceties & fantasies and confess the truth: Chump is no friend of Israel and has no intention of moving the embassy, not now; not ever.  Otherwise he would not use transparently false excuses for signing the waiver.

serious about promoting peace

    Who violated every provision of the Oslo Accords? Who refused every peace plan ever offered? Who always demands impossible preconditions? Who must go to Hell before peace can be possible?

gives peace a chance

    Only the funeral of the last living Muslim can give peace a chance!

just and lasting peace

    Translated to plain English: "Just Us". to Muslims, Justice is Shari'ah ruling the entire world with Dar al-harb entirely subsumed by Dar al-Islam: the fruits of global conquest. 

    If you want peace, tell the Muslims to go to Hell and punch their tickets.