Sunday, March 18, 2018

Reply To Not Represented

NewComment at WND Reply To Not Represented

    The Censors at World Net Daily frown on links, since they sat on my reply to another commentator, I am revising and extending my comment and posting it for his benefit. has an extensive library of books. Some come from Google Books, others from user uploads. All are in pdf format and most can be streamed or downloaded.  Some have text panes, others are all jpg.

I find the search engine hard to use, so I use Google: " Sahih Bukhari English pdf", substituting the title and sometimes volume number.

My blog: has a page entitled" "Library For Tracing Broken Links". There are links to various texts near the bottom of that page.

There are other sources, too numerous to recall. is a good one, you can find Tabari there and nowhere else that I know of.

Amazon has much of that stuff, some very expensive. "Reliance Of The Traveller", the shari'ah of the Shafi'i school of law, for example. 

For searches, for example ti verify quotes, try: for 50 || Koran translations for comparison and a link to corpusquran, an Arabic/English word by word breakdown with dictionary & concordance.

Hadith searches:  of cuss, it, like all the on line databases, is abridged.  Search for "regarding spears' and you will not find an English translation of the Arabic. has a powerful general search tab that returns results from the Koran, six sittah and several tafsirs, some of which i never herd of.

For the beginner: each chapter is in pdf format but there is a zip archive containing the 1000 page book. It's "In His Own Words" appendix is one of the best parts but avoid using Winn's Koran quotes 'cuz he melded five translations and they won't match up with any of the originals.

    Much vital information can be found in some of my blog posts which have been compiled in pdf format so they can be embedded in blog posts or attached to emails.  "Islam 101 For Politicians" has several of them embedded. "Islam 101 For Clergy & Congregants"  loads faster 'cuz the pdfs are linked instead of loaded. It includes two files not found in the other  Islam 101 page: "Allah Is Not God" & "Islam Is Demonic".

    Feel free to explore: Hit the Home link in the upper left corner and scroll through recent posts. The series on the impossibility of peace has many essential details:

    Feel free to comment! Disqus is enabled on the posts, but not pages.

Sunday, March 04, 2018

Why Chump's Ultimate Deal Will Fall Through: Peace Is Impossible While Islam Exists!

Gatestone Cmnt Update: World Israel News has reposted Tahiri's article with Disqus Comments. Join the debate!!!
    The paragraph below is my response to Trump the Deal-maker and the Middle East  by Amir Taheri  •  March 4, 2018 at 5:00 am.  Amir Taheri explained, in historical and thematic terms, why Trump's ultimate deal will fall through. I explain why all plans that do not involve the elimination of Islam will fail. I have added links to the text citations and relevant quotes below with the crucial clauses emphasized.

I take a quote, out of context, from John Q. Adams about Muhammad: "...he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind." I gave bold font emphasis to the key phrase: "exterminating war" for good cause: it defines Islamic Jihad as existential war. Open a Qur'an or tafsir to 8:39 and consider the terminal condition of Jihad against pagans: worship for Allah alone without partners in the whole of the world / altogether and everywhere. Open The reliance Of the Traveller to o9.9 and see the terminal condition: until they become Muslims. The terminal conditions of 9:29 are subjugation & extortion, codified in Reliance o9.8. Only the last battle wins a war. War continues until the last battle. exterminating / existential war ends with extermination. Which side should be exterminated: prey or predator?! Which side is the prey and which side is the predator? What did Muhammad pray for at the battle of Badr?[Guillaume 289] What did he pray for at Khaybar? [Ibid 512] To whom did he pray and what for before every ghazwat? [Ibid 510-511]. I intend to blog this with links at Islam Exposed.

[Emphasis added.]

'This is 'the Quraysh caravan containing their property. Go out to attack it, perhaps
God Will give It as a prey.'

'Abdullah b. Abu Bakr told me that one of Aslam told him that B. Sahm
of Aslam came to the apostle and complained that they had fought and got
nothing and found nothing with the apostle which he could give them. He
said: ~O God, You know their condition and that they have no strength,
and that I have nothing to give them, so conquer for them the wealthiest
of the enemy's forts with the richest food.' The following day God conquered
the fort of al-Sa'b b, Mu'adh which contained the richest food in
760 When the apostle had conquered some of their forts and got possession
of some of their property he came to their two forts al-Watih and al-Sulalim,
the last to be taken, and the apostle besieged them for some ten nights

'0 God, Lord of the heavens and what they o'ershadow
757 And Lord of the lands and what they make to grow
And Lord of the devils and what into error they throw
And Lord of the winds and what they winnow,
We ask Thee for the good of this town and the good of its people and the
good of what is in it,
and we take refuge in Thee from its evil and the evil
of its people and the evil that is in it. Forward in the name of Allah.' He
used to say that of every town he entered.

[8:67. It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom) until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing the captives), but Allâh desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allâh is All-Mighty, All-Wise. ]

o9.8: The Objectives of Jihad

The caliph (o25) makes war upon Jews, Christians, and Zoroastrians (N: provided he has first invited them to enter Islam in faith and practice, and if they will not, then invited them to enter the social order of Islam by paying the non-Muslim poll tax (jizya, def: o11.4) -which is the significance of their paying it, not the money itself-while remaining in their ancestral religions) (O: and the war continues) until they become Muslim or else pay the non-Muslim poll tax (O: in accordance with the word of Allah Most High,

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah and the Last Day and who forbid not what Allah and His messenger have forbidden-who do not practice the religion of truth, being of those who have been given the Book-until they pay the poll tax out of hand and are humbled" (Koran 9.29),

the time and place for which is before the final descent of Jesus (upon whom be peace).  After his final coming, nothing but Islam will be accepted from them, for taking the poll tax is only effective until Jesus' descent (upon him and our Prophet be peace), which is the divinely revealed law of Muhammad. The coming of Jesus does not entail a separate divinely revealed law, for he will rule by the law of Muhammad. As for the Prophet's saying (Allah bless him and give him peace),

"I am the last, there will be no prophet after me,"

this does not contradict the final coming of Jesus (upon whom be peace), since he will not rule according to the Evangel, but as a follower of our Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace) ).


The caliph fights all other peoples until they become Muslim (O: because they are not a people with a Book, nor honored as such, and are not permitted to settle with paying the poll tax (jizya) ) (n: though according to the Hanafi school, peoples of all other religions, even idol worshippers, are permitted to live under the protection of the Islamic state if they either become Muslim or agree to pay the poll tax, the sole exceptions to which are apostates from Islam and idol worshippers who are Arabs, neither of whom has any choice but becoming Muslim (al-Hidaya sharh Bidaya al-mubtadi' (y21), 6.48-49) ).

    Which side is the predator?!? Return to the quote of Reliance o9.8 above and read the conditional clause.   If you are under attack, do you prosletyze the attacker before retaliating?! 

    I dissected the Muslim version of Trump's ultimate deal, go and read the details. I exhibited and explained the ayat and ahadith which make peace impossible in a multipart series on "Why Peace Is Impossible".

   It is not an Arab vs Jew conflict. Exterminating the Jews will not end the war. If Iran nuked Israel tomorrow, Muslims would remain  obligated to reconquer the Balkans and al-Andalus.

    President Trump: What part of "From the river to the sea" do you not comprehend? What part of "first the Saturday people, then the Sunday people" do you not understand?. What part of the Islamic law quoted above do you not comprhend? What does the caliph do and why. "If there is no caliph, no permission is reqired.".

Thursday, March 01, 2018

More Facebook Censorship

Facebook Censorship! Someone commented in a Disqus thread: "It is a bad time to be a Muslim."  I replied and shared my reply on Facebook. This was the result.

    Website comments and Facebook  shares are not good places for writing books. And why reinvent the wheel?  If anyone objected, they could click through and respond on Disqus and I would gladly document the part the object to.   Instead, they resorted to censorship.


    It is the worst time to be a slave of Satan! Muslim = slave of Satan. The Hilali/Lhan translation of the Qur'an includes 3 surahs mentioning "slave of Allah"
  • 2:23. And if you (Arab pagans, Jews, and Christians) are in doubt concerning that which We have sent down (i.e. the Qur'ân) to Our slave (Muhammad Peace be upon him ), then produce a Sûrah (chapter) of the like thereof and call your witnesses (supporters and helpers) besides Allâh, if you are truthful.
  • 19:30. "He ['Iesa (Jesus)] said: Verily! I am a slave of Allâh, He has given me the Scripture and made me a Prophet;"

  • 19:93. There is none in the heavens and the earth but comes unto the Most Beneficent (Allâh) as a slave.

    If Moe was Allah's slave, Jesus is Allah's slave and there is none on earth who is not his slave, then, Muslim what are you? You are Allah's slave. And who is Allah?

of Satan

    Muslims are brainwashed to believe that Allah = Jehovah. It ain't true! The facts recorded in the Qur'am hadith and Sira are fatal to the falacy.  I documented them here:
    Moe said that he does not worship what you worship. He told Alllah, in case of his defeat at Badr, he'd never again be worshiped. If the Christians of Yemen and Egypt worshiped Allah, that threat would be void. Who then? At Badr, he preyed for the caravan "as a prey" At every ghazwat, he prayed to the "Lord Of  the Devils"; who might that be?

    In the cave of Hira, Moe believed he was squeezed by the devil, possessed or going mad. He received revelations through "the musical instrument of Satan". he had "an attachment of devils".  And the facts are documented in the two pdf files linked above!

Canonical Books

    And I posted links to them. The link to Relince is broken, the others should be good. Anyone with intenet access can obtain those books. I did, and I quoted and linked to them in my post about the hijab.

predators & prey

    The proof is in Islamic law: Hedaa, the guidance of the Hanafi madhab, used by the Ottoman Empire. Infidels may be attacked without provocation. The ostensible purpose of Jihad is Allah's good pleasure. The real objective is plunder. The facts are clear on the face of the text: vol. 2, pages 141, 144, 145 & 214. Read'em and weep!
    No attack here, just statements of fact found in Islam's canonical texts! LibTards object to exhibition of the facts.  They lack facts, having only raw emotions and maundery, they can not debate in an open forum.


Wednesday, February 28, 2018

Ultimate Deal: To Hell With Trump's Peace Plan!!!

Peace Plan Updated
Ultimate Deal: To Hell With Trump's Peace Plan!!!
    World Israel News reports that a Saudi news paper is reporting suposed details of Trumps grand plan. If there is any truth in the Arab claims, the plan must be rejected and Chump should be replaced.  Breitbart and JPost have similar articles citing Asharq al-Awsat. I found nothing relevant on their web page and no links to the cited content.

    Update:  03/01/18.
  • I have not found the original article, but I did find two new commentaries on it to share with you:
    • Prince Tahiri, an Iranian journalist, has some historical insight and analysis which whould be read. Unfortunately it is in Arabic and the Google translation is not easy reading.  But read it anyway!

  • Unacceptable elements:
    • Falestinian state
    • division of Jerusalem
    • internationalization of the Old City Of David
    • relocation of 'settlements'
    • $40B to Falestine.
    if any part of that is in the proposal, I will be voting for Senator Ted Cruz in the '20 presidential primary and will write him in in November.

    Jews are the Palestinian people. Palestine is a name imposed by Rome after a revolt. It is an insult to the Jews, renaming Israel to Philistine. There is no Falestinian people, a political invention consisting of undifferentiated Arabs who never had a state, capital or distinct culture of their own.

     King David bought the city from a Jebusite.  It was his capital and has never been the capital city of any other entity. Hussein illegally seized half the city in '48 and lost it when he attacked again in '67. It is Israel's capital city. There can be no peace without all Muslims quitting all claims to all of Israel!!!

    The location of the Temples, crucifixion & resurrection is holy to Jews and Christians. The false Muslim claim is based on a nightmare described in Sira as the Night Journey
  • Camel Shit!
    • No equine exists with wings and a human face.
    • No equine could span the horizon with it's hooves.
    • Seven heavens alludes to the seven naked eye planets: no way to get there!
    • There was no mosque in Jerusalem in Moe's lifetime!
    When asked what he wanted conquered first, Yemen or Syria, the Arrogant AssWhole said Syria, for Allah  has, on my account, taken a special charge of the people of Syria.  even if Umar's conquest could confer good title, the Orcs lost the Levant in WW1 and Hussein lost East Jerusalem  in '67. Muslims have no right title or claim to it!!!

    For reasons cited above, the internationalization of Jerusalem in the League Of Nations partition plan was invalid and irrational. Since the Muslims rejected it in favor of war, it is expired, null & void.

    Where can Jews live in peace and security except on their on land? Sharon's blunder: giving Gaza to Falestinians  is exemplary: they immediately used it as a launching pad for new attacks and continue to do so. 

   " Millions for defense but not one cent for tribute!"  What Goddamn Fool thinks that any money given to Falestinians will not be invested in further attacks against Israel? 
    Peace in a pi's Ass!!! There has been no peace since 623 and will be none while the earth is Muslim infested!!! There is no plan, deal or grand bargain that can overcome that reality. Therefore no plan should be fabricated and promulgated; a total waste of time money and effort.

    My recent series: Why Peace Is Impossible, lays out the disgusting details:

Monday, February 19, 2018

Hijab: Headbag Full Of Crap~Open Defecation In The Desert!

Hijab Billboard

    Robert Spencer, writing at Jihad Watch, informs us of a new billboard campaign intended to deceive kuffar about the hijab: Muslim head bag. 
Spencer told the story of the billboard propagandists, then listed several fake hijab attacks and a long string of real attacks on women who refused to wear it. 
Click through the link above and read the whole article for it is informative.

    I am taking a different angle. I will show you the billboard fantasy and the reality.  Fasten your seat belts!

Now view the reality: this graphic novel documents it, as I will show you below.

. .

Click through and read more variants!

Sahih Bukhari

Volume 1, Book 4, Number 148:

Narrated 'Aisha:

The wives of the Prophet used to go to Al-Manasi, a vast open place (near Baqia at Medina) to answer the call of nature at night. 'Umar used to say to the Prophet "Let your wives be veiled," but Allah's Apostle did not do so. One night Sauda bint Zam'a the wife of the Prophet went out at 'Isha' time and she was a tall lady. 'Umar addressed her and said, "I have recognized you, O Sauda." He said so, as he desired eagerly that the verses of Al-Hijab (the observing of veils by the Muslim women) may be revealed. So Allah revealed the verses of "Al-Hijab" (A complete body cover excluding the eyes).

Sahih Bukhari

Volume 6, Book 60, Number 318:

Narrated Aisha:

Sauda (the wife of the Prophet) went out to answer the call of nature after it was made obligatory (for all the Muslims ladies) to observe the veil. She was a fat huge lady, and everybody who knew her before could recognize her. So 'Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her and said, "O Sauda! By Allah, you cannot hide yourself from us, so think of a way by which you should not be recognized on going out. Sauda returned while Allah's Apostle was in my house taking his supper and a bone covered with meat was in his hand. She entered and said, "O Allah's Apostle! I went out to answer the call of nature and 'Umar said to me so-and-so." Then Allah inspired him (the Prophet) and when the state of inspiration was over and the bone was still in his hand as he had not put in down, he said (to Sauda), "You (women) have been allowed to go out for your needs."

Volume 8, Book 74, Number 257:

Narrated 'Aisha:

(the wife of the Prophet) 'Umar bin Al-Khattab used to say to Allah's Apostle "Let your wives be veiled" But he did not do so. The wives of the Prophet used to go out to answer the call of nature at night only at Al-Manasi.' Once Sauda, the daughter of Zam'a went out and she was a tall woman. 'Umar bin Al-Khattab saw her while he was in a gathering, and said, "I have recognized you, O Sauda!" He ('Umar) said so as he was anxious for some Divine orders regarding the veil (the veiling of women.) So Allah revealed the Verse of veiling. (Al-Hijab; a complete body cover excluding the eyes). (See Hadith No. 148, Vol. 1)

Sahih Muslim

Book 026, Number 5395:

A'isha reported that Sauda (Allah he pleated with her) went out (in the fields) in order to answer the call of nature even after the time when veil had been prescribed for women. She had been a bulky lady, significant in height amongst the women, and she could not conceal herself from him who had known her. 'Umar b. Khattab saw her and said: Sauda, by Allah, you cannot conceal from us. Therefore, be careful when you go out. She ('A'isha) said: She turned back. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) was at that time in my house having his evening meal and there was a bone in his hand. She (Sauda) cline and said: Allah's Messenger. I went out and 'Umar said to me so and so. She ('A'isha) reported: There came the revelation to him and then it was over; the bone was then in his hand and he had not thrown it and he said:" Permission has been granted to you that you may go out for your needs."

Book 026, Number 5396:

This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Hisham with the same chain of transmitters, and the words are: She (Sauda) was a woman who looked to be significant amongst the people (so far as the bulk of her) body was concerned. The rest of the hadith is the same.

Book 026, Number 5397:

'A'isha reported that the wives of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) used to go out in the cover of night when they went to open fields (in the outskirts of Medina) for easing themselves. 'Umar b Khattab used to say: Allah's Messenger, ask your ladies to observe veil, but Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) did not do that. So there went out Sauda, daughter of Zarn'a, the wife of Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), during one of the nights when it was dark. She was a tall statured lady. 'Umar called her saying: Sauda, we recognise you. (He did this with the hope that the verses pertaining to veil would be revealed.) 'A'isha said: Allah, the Exalted and Glorious, then revealed the verses pertaining to veil.

[Bold font emphasis added.]


    Did Sauda get any from Umar, before or after putting on the head bag?


    If Moe had any, he'd have built a proper latrine near their shacks.


    If the head bag made them stronger, they could fend off those attacks.

Islamic Status Of Women

    In his relation of Moe's final sermon, Ibn Ishaq has Moe likening Muslim wives to prisoners i.e. slaves. Tabari likens them to domestic animals. Oh what an exalted & honored status Muslim women enjoy!!!  With his  mahr, the Muslim purchases perpetual use of her reproductive organs.  Muslimas have no property and no control over their lives. They are essentially slaves. 

Lay Injunctions on women kindly, for they are prisoners
with you having no control~ of their persons. You have taken them only
as a trust from God, 3 and you have the enjoyment of their persons by the
words of God, so understand (To and listen to) my words, 0 men, for
I have told you. I have left with you something which if you will hold
fast to it you will never fall into error-a plain indication, the book of
God and the practice of His prophet, so give good heed to what I say.
Guillaume, "The Life Of Muhammad", pg. 651 pdf 349

Tabari v. VIIII p. 113 130 psf

"Now then, 0 people, you have a right over your wives and
they have a right over you. You have [the right) that they should
not cause anyone of whom you dislike to tread your beds; and
that they should not commit any open indecency (fallishah).772 If
they do, then God permits you to shut them in separate rooms
and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain from [evil], they
have the right to their food and clothing in accordance with
custom IM-maruf ). Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic
animals ('awdnm) with you and do not possess anything for
themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from God, and
you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word
of God, so understand and listen to my words, 0 people. I have
conveyed the Message, and have left you with something which,
if you hold fast to it, you will never go astray: that is, the Book of
God and the sunnah of His ProphetIII, pg 113
"Now then, 0 people, you have a right over your wives and
they have a right over you. You have [the right) that they should
not cause anyone of whom you dislike to tread your beds; and
that they should not commit any open indecency (fallishah).772 If
they do, then God permits you to shut them in separate rooms
and to beat them, but not severely. If they abstain from [evil], they
have the right to their food and clothing in accordance with
custom IM-maruf ). Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic
animals ('awdnm) with you and do not possess anything for
themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from God, and
you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word
of God, so understand and listen to my words, 0 people. I have
conveyed the Message, and have left you with something which,
if you hold fast to it, you will never go astray: that is, the Book of
God and the sunnah of His Prophet


    Islamic law forbids Kuffar imitation of Islamic garments!  Kaffir women squatting in solidarity with Muslimas break the treaty of dhimmitude, subjecting themselves to the death penalty. 

Pact Of Umar
We shall not seek to resemble the Muslims by imitating any of their garments, the qalansuwa, the turban, footwear, or the parting of the hair. We shall not speak as they do, nor shall we adopt their kunyas.

The Reliance Of The Traveller o11.5
-2- are distinguished from Muslims in dress, wearing a wide cloth belt (zunnar);

    Now that you know the truth about the Muslim head bag, who will you tel first?

Monday, February 12, 2018

Mid East Peace: Chump Continues In Ignorance and Obfuscation

Mid East Peace: Chump Continues In Ignorance and Obfuscation I was alerted to Israel Hayom's interview with President Trump by an article at Christianity Today .
I want you to click through those links and read the article and the interview, there is more important information  in them than I will cover here. I have excerpted two crucial questions and answers to dissect.

Q: Obviously there is suspense in Israel about the imminent peace plan. When will the U.S. unveil its peace plan?

"We are going to see what goes on. Right now, I would say the Palestinians are not looking to make peace, they are not looking to make peace. And I am not necessarily sure that Israel is looking to make peace. So we are just going to have to see what happens."

Q: Will settlements be part of the plan?

"We will be talking about settlements. The settlements are something that very much complicates and always have complicated making peace, so I think Israel has to be very careful with the settlements."

    Chump exposed his ignorance while being cagey and obscure.

The Aggressors

    It ain't "Palestinians"!  Only Jews are "Palestinians"!  The Arabs who pretend to be "Palestinians"! are invaders and occupiers, neither victims of aggression nor refugees.

The Enemy

    Falestinians are not the enemy, they are a subset of the enemy: Ummah al-Islamiyya. Muslims are enemies of the remainder of the human race. Muslims prey upon the remainder of the human race. That is what Islam is; what Muslims do.


    Islam is what makes Muslims inimical: Allah's imperatives, threat & promise: they are explained in a recent series on 'Why Peace Is Impossible".

Make Peace

    Only Muslims can make peace without exterminating the Muslims. Israel wants peace but is unwilling to exterminate Muslims.

    Muslim rejectionism is explained in my series on 'Why Peace Is Impossible". Read it and share what you learn with Chump.

    Muslims can make peace by apostatizing, quitting all claims to Israel and stopping inculcation of hatred & incitement of violence. They never will! 


    Chump is emulating Shrub & Obamination by screwing Israel! No friend of Israel will do that


    King David bought it from a Jubusite long ago. It belongs to Israel. It was never the capital city of any other entity. Muslims have no interest in or claim to it other than Moe's nightmare and Umar's conquest, which convey no right or title.

Obstacle To Peace

    Only Islam! Not Jerusalem. Not settlements. Not Israel. Only Islam!

Saturday, February 10, 2018

U.N:Freedom Of Religion~Terror In Sharia!

U.N:Freedom Of Religion~Terror In Sharia! In the previous installment, you discovered the meaning of terror as it applies to Islam. U.N:Freedom Of Religion~Terrorism Defined. In this final installment of the series on U.N. Ass Wholliness,  you will see that, besides the Islamic terror nexus previously documented:
Islamic law confirms what we already know: terrorism is intrinsic to Islam!  Terror is associated with Islam by Islamic scripture, exegesis, oral tradition , biography and law.

    In "Defense Of The Muslim Lands, Abdullah Azzam discusses fard al-kifaya and fard ayn. In that discussion, he quotes a Jurist of the Hanafi school of Islamic law as ruling that at least lne mission must be sent out in every year to terrorize infidels. 
[Click image to enlarge for legibility.]

Defense Of The Muslim Lands

    I do not find an explicit call for terrorism in "Reliance Of The Traveller", but two quotes declare  terrorizing or frightening a Believer (Muslim) to be an impermissible enormity. No mention of doing it to an infidel!  That means it is permissible to terrorize an infidel who is not under a treaty of protection.

986 w52 List of Enormities

(362-65) attacking anyone under the state's
protection in order to kill him, rob him, rape his
wife, terrorize or frighten him;

763    r28
r28.1 (Nahlawi:) To make a believer fear other
than disobedience or coerce him to do something
he is averse to, such as giving a gift, marrying, or
selling something-all this is hurting him, and
hurting a believer is unlawful. The Prophet (Allah
bless him and give him peace) said,
"Whoever frightens a believer, it is incumbent
that Allah not protect him from the terrors of
Judgement Day as a fitting recompense."
Najm al-Ghazzi says in Husn al-tanabbuh,
"Among the works of the Devil is frightening,
annoying, or alarming a believer, all of which is
unlawful" (ibid., 157-58).

    A Summary Of Islamic Jurisprudence has a juicy tidbit:  property abandoned by terrorized infidels is fei!

A Summary Of Islamic Jurisprudence 476

    Reliance is not the only handbook of Shari'ah. The Maliki's Risala does not mention terror but the Hanafi's Hedaya does, twice. Recall that, in 8:60, horses are kept to terrify the enemies, known and unknown.  This comes up in a discussion of distribution of spoils: the horseman gets a double share, one for him and one for his steed. 

     The first Excerpt, from the top of the page, reveals the purpose of keeping horses and sending infantry. The second, from the bottom of the page, reveals that it is the going out on an expedition that "impresses terror upon the infidels".

Hedaya 2.176

    Big deal, right? So horses are kept to terrorize infidels and going out to attack does it.  But wait! There is more!  UncleVladdi, of wised me up to a page I had overlooked. On page 154 and subsequent pages there is a discussion of granting letters of protection. Such letters are valid only if issued by a believing Muslim who is free to engage in Jihad. That is because the object of fear is the  source of protection and every Muslim must be an object of fear to infidels because he is liable to attack. 

    No, damn it! I did not make this up and I did not edit it. I only added some arrows to the excerpt to point out the critical clauses. Hedaya is poorly scanned an in an archaic font, with archaic  and arcane vocabulary & syntax.  It ain't easy reading. I provide a link so you can verify it.

    This is part of the code that governed the Ottoman Empire and India.

Hedaya 2.154

    The United Nazis reaffirm that: "Terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion"  I tell the United Nazis: Go to Hell and tell it to Allah & Moe!!! They made the association! Their Qur'an, hadith, exegesis, sira confirm it and Sharia codifies it. Islam is terrorism!!!

U.N:Freedom Of Religion~Terrorism Defined

terror fixup
U.N:Freedom Of Religion~Terrorism Defined The U.N. commands us to keep silent on the connection between Islam and terrorism. But what is Terrorism? What does the Qur'an meam when it says "terror"?

    Previous installment: U.N:Freedom Of Religion~Allah Commands Terrorism!

    To the United Nazis:  the impudent digit of contumacious defiance:

    To you, the fatal facts of Isdamn.


    The Hilali/Khan translation of the Holy Qur'an  includes 7 instances of "terror".
  1. 3:151
  2. 7:116
  3. 8:12
  4. 21:103
  5. 27:89
  6. 33:26
  7. 59:2
    The four citations marked with red font color are direct references to casting terror, without defining it. Those have been cited in previous installments of this series.  The two marked with blue font color are references to "the greatest terror". I have linked them in the list so that you can read them. The reference is to being cast into Hell on Judgment Day.
    The best description of the greatest terror is in Sahih Bukhari. I exhibit a page from volume 8 which describes children turning white haired, pregnant women aborting and men staggering as if intoxicated. A variant in vol. 4 adds nursing mothers abandoning their infants.

[ Click image to enlarge for legibility]

Sahih Bukhari #6530

    Terror means intense fear such that the terrorized will have no escape, no relief, no help and no hope. A state of damnation! Knowing that Allah is about to damn you; you are going to burn and there is nothing you can do. Knowing that Moe's army is attacking and there is no defense.

    The idea is to render you incapable of defending yourself against Islamic attack; to make you surrender without resisting.

    The ultimate expression of that concept is in a Pakistani strategy manual.  Terror is both ends and means: the conditions Muslims seek to impose. Read it and curse Isdamn for it is evil!!!

The Quranic Concept Of War

    Pull your head out of the sand, wipe the dust from your eyes and get a clue!  The element of terror is intrinsic to Jihad!  Allah will and did cast terror. Moe was made victorious with terror. It matters not whether a military base or a city is attacked. Whether they blow up a battleship or frag a churrh or shoot up a queer night club, it's terrorism. Every Islamic threat and attack is terrorism!!!

Next Installment: Terror In Sharia